Emulation of a Quantum Spin with a Superconducting Phase Qudit

Higher-Level Quantum Emulation At the heart of a quantum computer is the device on which information is to be encoded. This is typically done with a qubit, a two-level quantum system analogous to the two-level bit that encodes 0 and 1 in classical computers. However, there need not be just two quantum energy levels. There could be three (a qutrit), or more generally, d-levels (a qudit) in the device. Neeley et al. (p. 722; see the Perspective by Nori) demonstrate a five-level quantum device and show that their qudit can be used to emulate the processes involved in manipulating quantum spin. The use of multilevel qudits may also have potential in quantum information processing by simplifying certain computational tasks and simplifying the circuitry required to realize the quantum computer itself. A multilevel superconducting device is used to emulate the manipulation of quantum spin systems. In quantum information processing, qudits (d-level systems) are an extension of qubits that could speed up certain computing tasks. We demonstrate the operation of a superconducting phase qudit with a number of levels d up to d = 5 and show how to manipulate and measure the qudit state, including simultaneous control of multiple transitions. We used the qudit to emulate the dynamics of single spins with principal quantum number s = 1/2, 1, and 3/2, allowing a measurement of Berry’s phase and the even parity of integer spins (and odd parity of half-integer spins) under 2π-rotation. This extension of the two-level qubit to a multilevel qudit holds promise for more-complex quantum computational architectures and for richer simulations of quantum mechanical systems.

[1]  Marco Barbieri,et al.  Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces , 2009 .

[2]  M. Ben-Or,et al.  Simple and secure quantum key distribution with biphotons , 2007, 0709.3804.

[3]  Erik Lucero,et al.  High-fidelity gates in a single josephson qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[4]  M. Steffen,et al.  State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[5]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  Tobias J. Hagge,et al.  Physics , 1929, Nature.

[7]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation , 2000, quant-ph/0002077.

[8]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Transformed dissipation in superconducting quantum circuits , 2008, 0801.2994.

[9]  W. Pauli The Connection Between Spin and Statistics , 1940 .

[10]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[11]  S. Deleglise,et al.  Process tomography of field damping and measurement of Fock state lifetimes by quantum nondemolition photon counting in a cavity. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[12]  R. Colella,et al.  Observation of the Phase Shift of a Neutron Due to Precession in a Magnetic Field , 1975 .

[13]  Clare C. Yu,et al.  Decoherence in Josephson qubits from dielectric loss. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[14]  A N Cleland,et al.  Measurement of the decay of Fock states in a superconducting quantum circuit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[15]  J. Clarke,et al.  Superconducting quantum bits , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Gerald Badurek,et al.  Verification of coherent spinor rotation of fermions , 1975 .

[17]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[18]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  Criteria for exact qudit universality , 2004, quant-ph/0407223.

[19]  Jr.,et al.  Multivalued logic gates for quantum computation , 2000, quant-ph/0002033.

[20]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Toward an understanding of the spin-statistics theorem , 1998 .

[21]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  Parallelism for quantum computation with qudits , 2006, quant-ph/0603081.

[22]  J. J. Sakurai,et al.  Modern Quantum Mechanics , 1986 .

[23]  P. Leek,et al.  Resolving Vacuum Fluctuations in an Electrical Circuit by Measuring the Lamb Shift , 2008, Science.

[24]  M. Steffen,et al.  Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography , 2006, Science.

[25]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Accurate Control of Josephson Phase Qubits , 2003 .

[26]  M. Berry Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[27]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum Coherent Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits , 2007, Science.

[28]  David A. Green,et al.  Historical Supernovae and Their Remnants , 2002 .