Effects of fibre/matrix adhesion on carbon-fibre-reinforced metal laminates—I.: Residual strength

Abstract The role of interfacial adhesion between fibre and matrix on the residual strength behaviour of carbon-fibre-reinforced metal laminates (FRMLs) has been investigated. Differences in fibre/matrix adhesion were achieved by using treated and untreated carbon fibres in an epoxy resin system. Mechanical characterisation tests were conducted on bulk composite specimens to determine various properties such as interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) and transverse tension strength which clearly illustrate the difference in fibre/matrix interfacial adhesion. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the difference in fracture surfaces, the untreated fibre composites showing interfacial failure while the treated fibre composites showed matrix failure. No clear differences were found for the mechanical properties such as tensile strength and Young's modulus of the FRMLs despite the differences in the bulk composite properties. A reduction of 7·5% in the apparent value of the ILSS was identified for the untreated fibre laminates by both three-point and five-point bend tests. Residual strength and blunt notch tests showed remarkable increases in strength for the untreated fibre specimens over the treated ones. Increases of up to 20% and 14% were found for specimens with a circular hole and saw cut, respectively. The increase in strength is attributed to the promotion of fibre/matrix splitting and large delamination zones in the untreated fibre specimens owing to the weak fibre/matrix interface.

[1]  The Influence of Stress Ratio and Temperature on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior of ARALL , 1993 .

[2]  R. Marissen Fatigue Crack Growth Predictions in Aramid Reinforced Aluminum Laminates (ARALL) , 1988 .

[3]  A. Atkins Intermittent bonding for high toughness/ high strength composites , 1975 .

[4]  W. Bradley,et al.  Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Real-Time Fracture Mechanism of Some Toughened Graphite/Epoxy Composites , 1987 .

[5]  R. Marissen,et al.  FLIGHT SIMULATION BEHAVIOR OF ARAMID REINFORCED ALUMINUM LAMINATES , 1984 .

[6]  Progressive Damage and Residual Strength of a Carbon Fibre Reinforced Metal Laminate , 1997 .

[7]  J. E. Gordon,et al.  A mechanism for the control of crack propagation in all-brittle systems , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  M. G. Bader,et al.  Some aspects of interface adhesion of electrolytically oxidized carbon fibres in an epoxy-resin matrix , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[9]  J. B. Young,et al.  Crack growth and residual strength characteristics of two grades of glass-reinforced aluminium ‘Glare’ , 1994 .

[10]  M. O. Hunt,et al.  New interlaminar shear test for structural wood composites , 1990 .

[11]  L. Drzal,et al.  Adhesion of Graphite Fibers to Epoxy Matrices: I. The Role of Fiber Surface Treatment , 1983 .

[12]  R. Bucci,et al.  A crack growth resistance curve approach to fiber/metal laminate fracture toughness evaluation , 1993 .

[13]  N. L. Hancox,et al.  Fibre composite hybrid materials , 1981 .

[14]  Y. Mai,et al.  The effect of adhesive bonding between aluminum and composite prepreg on the mechanical properties of carbon-fiber-reinforced metal laminates , 1997 .

[15]  Y. Mai,et al.  Effects of interfacial coating and temperature on the fracture behaviours of unidirectional Kevlar and carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin composites , 1991 .

[16]  R. Marissen,et al.  Flight simulation behaviour of aramid reinforced aluminium laminates (ARALL) , 1984 .

[17]  J. Schijve Fatigue of aircraft materials and structures , 1994 .