Carbon isotope composition of C4 grasses is influenced by light and water supply

The carbon isotope composition of C4 grasses has the potential to be used as an indicator of changes in the isotopic composition and concentration of atmospheric CO2, especially for climate reconstruction. The usefulness of C4 grasses for this purpose hinges on the assumption that their photosynthetic discrimination against 13C remains constant in a wide range of environmental conditions. We tested this assumption by examining the effects of light and water stress on the carbon isotope composition of C4 grasses using different biochemical subtypes (NADP-ME, NAD-ME, PCK) in glasshouse experiments. We grew 14 different C4 grass species in four treatments: sun-watered, sun-drought, shade-watered and shade-drought. Carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) rarely remained constant. In general, Δ values were lowest in sun-watered grasses, greater for sun-drought plants and even higher for plants of the shade-watered treatment. The highest Δ values were generally found in the most stressed grasses, the shade-drought plants. Grasses of the NADP-ME subtype were the least influenced by a change in environmental variables, followed by PCK and NAD-ME subtypes. Water availability affected the carbon isotope discrimination less than light limitation in PCK and NAD-ME subtypes, but similarly in NADP-ME subtypes. In another experiment, we studied the effect of increasing light levels (150 to 1500 μmol photons m−2 s−1) on the Δ values of 18 well-watered C4 grass species. Carbon isotope discrimination remained constant until photon flux density (PFD) was less than 700 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Below this light level, Δ values increased with decreasing irradiance for all biochemical subtypes. The change in A was less pronounced in NADP-ME and PCK than in NAD-ME grasses. Grasses grown in the field and in the glasshouse showed a similar pattern. Thus, caution should be exercised when using C4 plants under varying environmental conditions to monitor the concentration or carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 in field/glasshouse studies or climate reconstruction.

[1]  P. Ciais,et al.  A high-resolution record of atmospheric CO2 content from carbon isotopes in pet , 1994, Nature.

[2]  F I Woodward,et al.  Ecophysiological responses of plants to global environmental change since the Last Glacial Maximum. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[3]  S. Fry,et al.  Novel O-D-Galacturonoyl Esters in the Pectic Polysaccharides of Suspension-Cultured Plant Cells , 1993, Plant physiology.

[4]  G. Edwards,et al.  C4 Photosynthesis (The CO2-Concentrating Mechanism and Photorespiration) , 1993, Plant physiology.

[5]  Yang Wang,et al.  Expansion of C4 ecosystems as an indicator of global ecological change in the late Miocene , 1993, Nature.

[6]  M. Peisker,et al.  Carbon: terrestrial C4 plants , 1992 .

[7]  D. Buxton,et al.  Growth of C3 and C4 perennial grasses under reduced irradiance , 1992 .

[8]  M. McElroy,et al.  Glacial-to-interglacial variations in the carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 , 1992, Nature.

[9]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Short-term measurements of carbon isotope discrimination in several C4 species , 1992 .

[10]  M. McElroy,et al.  Isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 inferred from carbon in C4 plant cellulose , 1991, Nature.

[11]  W. Bowman,et al.  Short-Term Changes in Leaf Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Salt- and Water-Stressed C4 Grasses , 1989 .

[12]  L. Tieszen,et al.  Stable Carbon Isotopes in Terrestrial Ecosystem Research , 1989 .

[13]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[14]  S. Leavitt,et al.  Stable carbon isotope chronologies from trees in the southwestern United States , 1988 .

[15]  R. Ohsugi,et al.  δ13C Values and the Occurrence of Suberized Lamellae in Some Panicum Species. , 1988 .

[16]  H. Singh,et al.  DIAZOTROPHIC REGULATION OF AKINETE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CYANOBACTERIUM ANABAENA DOLIOLUM , 1987 .

[17]  H. Friedli,et al.  Ice core record of the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries , 1986, Nature.

[18]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination measured concurrently with gas exchange to investigate CO2 diffusion in leaves of higher plants , 1986 .

[19]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: II. Effects of Short-Term Exposures to Different Photon Flux Densities. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[20]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: I. Influence of Nitrogen Nutrition, Phosphorus Nutrition, Photon Flux Density, and Ambient Partial Pressure of CO(2) during Ontogeny. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[21]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: III. Influences of Water Stress and Photoinhibition. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[22]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Variation in Quantum Yield for CO(2) Uptake among C(3) and C(4) Plants. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[23]  G. Farquhar,et al.  On the Nature of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in C4 Species , 1983 .

[24]  M. O'Leary.  Carbon isotope fractionation in plants , 1981 .

[25]  M. Stuiver.  Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Reservoir Changes , 1978, Science.

[26]  Bruce N. Smith,et al.  Influence of Carbon Source, Oxygen Concentration, Light Intensity, and Temperature on 13C/12C Ratios in Plant Tissues , 1976, Botanical Gazette.