Greenhouse gas emissions of imported and locally produced fruit and vegetable commodities: A quantitative assessment

Abstract Today considerable efforts are being made in identifying means of further energy efficiencies within the UK food system. Current air importation of fruit and vegetables (FVs) generates large amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions part of which could be avoided. Local food production has been recognized as an environmentally feasible alternative production option and could help reduce GHG emissions, as required under the legally binding emissions targets stipulated by the UK Climate Change Act 2008. Climate change impacts of FVs importation were determined for a selection of five indigenous FV commodities, namely: apples, cherries, strawberries, garlic and peas. Carbon dioxide equivalents (CO 2 e) emissions associated with the production and transport stages were calculated using the sample of selected fruit and vegetables (SFVs). The latter stage includes three diverse geographic locations/regions for emissions comparison, namely the UK, Europe and non-European (NE) countries. On average (across the five SFVs), NE commodities, all in fresh/chilled state, were found to contain embedded (arising from production, air freighting and distribution within the UK) GHG emissions of 10.16 kg CO 2 e/kg. This is 9.66 kg more CO 2 e emissions compared to a kilogram of these commodities produced and supplied locally. A scenario-based approach determined the level of emissions savings that could be achieved by local FVs production in the UK. The least dramatic change of SCENARIO-1 (25% reduction in NE SFVs imports by increasing their local production by the same amount) could save 28.9 kt CO 2 e/year, while SCENARIO-2 (50% reduction in NE SFVs imports) and SCENARIO-3 (75% reduction in NE SFVs imports) could result in saving of 57.8 kt and 86.7 kt, respectively.

[1]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  G. Edwards‐Jones Does eating local food reduce the environmental impact of food production and enhance consumer health? , 2010, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[3]  W. Bruce Traill,et al.  Local, national and imported foods: A qualitative study , 2007, Appetite.

[4]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: an update on IPCC (1999) , 2005 .

[5]  T. Fæhn,et al.  Richer and cleaner : At others' expense? , 2009 .

[6]  Roland Clift,et al.  The relative importance of transport in determining an appropriate sustainability strategy for food sourcing , 2006 .

[7]  S. Parkinson,et al.  Localisation of UK food production: an analysis using land area and energy as indicators , 2003 .

[8]  E. Schlich,et al.  The Ecology of Scale: Assessment of Regional Energy Turnover and Comparison with Global Food (5 pp) , 2005 .

[9]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Comparing domestic versus imported apples: A focus on energy use , 2007, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[10]  David Coley,et al.  Local food, food miles and carbon emissions: a comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches. , 2009 .

[11]  Antonio F. Amores,et al.  Consistent and unbiased carbon dioxide emission multipliers: performance of Danish emission reductions via external trade. , 2010 .

[12]  Robert Dyball,et al.  Local food: understanding consumer motivations in innovative retail formats , 2011 .

[13]  David S. Lee,et al.  Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Aviation , 2009, Atmospheric Environment.

[14]  Darra Goldstein,et al.  Cooking Up a Storm , 2005 .

[15]  Andy Jones,et al.  An Environmental Assessment of Food Supply Chains: A Case Study on Dessert Apples , 2002, Environmental management.

[16]  Wolfgang Grimme,et al.  The inclusion of aviation into the EU emission trading scheme – Impacts on competition between European and non-European network airlines , 2010 .