Predictive transport simulations of real-time profile control in JET advanced tokamak plasmas

Predictive, time-dependent transport simulations with a semi-empirical plasma model have been used in closed-loop simulations to control the q-profile and the strength and location of the internal transport barrier (ITB). Five transport equations (Te, Ti, q, ne, vΦ) are solved, and the power levels of lower hybrid current drive, NBI and ICRH are calculated in a feedback loop determined by the feedback controller matrix. The real-time control (RTC) technique and algorithms used in the transport simulations are identical to those implemented and used in JET experiments (Laborde L. et al 2005 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47 155 and Moreau D. et al 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 870). The closed-loop simulations with RTC demonstrate that varieties of q-profiles and pressure profiles in the ITB can be achieved and controlled simultaneously. The simulations also showed that with the same RTC technique as used in JET experiments, it is possible to sustain the q-profiles and pressure profiles close to their set-point profiles for longer than the current diffusion time. In addition, the importance of being able to handle the multiple time scales to control the location and strength of the ITB is pointed out. Several future improvements and perspectives of the RTC scheme are presented.

[1]  A. Murari,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Active control of the current density profile in JET , 2003 .

[2]  T. Hellsten,et al.  Comparison of time dependent simulations with experiments in ion cyclotron heated plasmas , 1993 .

[3]  V. Parail,et al.  Development of a non-local model for tokamak heat transport in L-mode, H-mode and transient regimes , 1997 .

[4]  C. D. Challis,et al.  The use of internal transport barriers in tokamak plasmas , 2004 .

[5]  T. S. Taylor,et al.  Physics of advanced tokamaks , 1997 .

[6]  J. Weiland,et al.  Micro-stability and transport modelling of internal transport barriers on JET , 2003 .

[7]  J. Weiland,et al.  Fully predictive time-dependent transport simulations of ITB plasmas in JET, JT-60U and DIII-D , 2006 .

[8]  W. Houlberg,et al.  Bootstrap current and neoclassical transport in tokamaks of arbitrary collisionality and aspect ratio , 1997 .

[9]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Triggering of internal transport barrier in JET , 2002 .

[10]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A model-based technique for integrated real-time profile control in the JET tokamak , 2004 .

[11]  A. D. Piliya,et al.  Fast ray tracing code for LHCD simulations , 1996 .

[12]  P. C. de Vries,et al.  Real-time control of the q-profile in JET for steady state advanced tokamak operation , 2003 .

[13]  Jukka Heikkinen,et al.  ITB formation in terms of ωE×B flow shear and magnetic shear s on JET , 2001 .

[14]  X. Litaudon,et al.  A dimensionless criterion for characterizing internal transport barriers in JET , 2002 .

[15]  L. Lao,et al.  Reconstruction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks , 1985 .

[16]  C. D. Challis,et al.  Non-inductively driven currents in JET , 1989 .

[17]  C. Gormezano,et al.  A review of internal transport barrier physics for steady-state operation of tokamaks , 2004 .