Why Develop Open Source Software? The Role of Non-Pecuniary Benefits, Monetary Rewards and Open Source Licence Type

A review of the basic theory of optimal open-source software contributions points to three key factors affecting supply: non-pecuniary benefits, future expected monetary returns, and open-source licence type. This paper argues that existing large-scale software developer surveys are inadequate for measuring the relative importance of these three factors. Moreover, previous econometric studies that collect their own unique datasets generally measure the importance of only one supply factor in isolation. To fill the gap, I specify a dynamic programming model of joint labour supply and open-source contribution decisions that can provide empirical estimates of relative importance within a single unified framework.

[1]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[2]  M. Keane,et al.  The Career Decisions of Young Men , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Ernan Haruvy,et al.  Incentives for Developers’ Contributions and Product Performance Metrics in Open Source Development: An Empirical Exploration , 2005 .

[4]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[5]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  Homesteading the Noosphere , 1998, First Monday.

[6]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond , 2004 .

[7]  R. Sauer,et al.  Job Mobility and the Market for Lawyers , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing , 2007 .

[9]  Kenneth I. Wolpin,et al.  The Solution and Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Models by Simulation and Interpol , 1994 .

[10]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[11]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[12]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  The Jukebox Mode of Innovation - a Model of Commercial Open Source Development , 2004 .

[13]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[14]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2003 .

[15]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[16]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[17]  Eric Lease Morgan,et al.  Review of The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary by Eric S. Raymond, Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly, 1999 , 2000 .

[18]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The magic Cauldron , 1999 .

[19]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[20]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[21]  Jeffrey A. Roberts,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC RETURNS TO OPEN SOURCE PARTICIPATION , 2004 .

[22]  Justin P. Johnson Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good , 2002 .

[23]  von Hippel,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4366-02 June 2002 Open source projects as horizontal innovation networks-by and for users , 2003 .

[24]  Gregorio Robles,et al.  Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study - FLOSS FINAL REPORT , 2002 .