Evolutionary-guided de novo structure prediction of self-associated transmembrane helical proteins with near-atomic accuracy

How specific protein associations regulate the function of membrane receptors remains poorly understood. Conformational flexibility currently hinders the structure determination of several classes of membrane receptors and associated oligomers. Here we develop EFDOCK-TM, a general method to predict self-associated transmembrane protein helical (TMH) structures from sequence guided by co-evolutionary information. We show that accurate intermolecular contacts can be identified using a combination of protein sequence covariation and TMH binding surfaces predicted from sequence. When applied to diverse TMH oligomers, including receptors characterized in multiple conformational and functional states, the method reaches unprecedented near-atomic accuracy for most targets. Blind predictions of structurally uncharacterized receptor tyrosine kinase TMH oligomers provide a plausible hypothesis on the molecular mechanisms of disease-associated point mutations and binding surfaces for the rational design of selective inhibitors. The method sets the stage for uncovering novel determinants of molecular recognition and signalling in single-spanning eukaryotic membrane receptors.

[1]  K. Wucherpfennig,et al.  Common themes in the assembly and architecture of activating immune receptors , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[2]  N. Tinel,et al.  Cell-surface protein-protein interaction analysis with time-resolved FRET and snap-tag technologies: application to GPCR oligomerization , 2008, Nature Methods.

[3]  D. Schneider,et al.  Transmembrane helix-helix interactions involved in ErbB receptor signaling , 2010, Cell adhesion & migration.

[4]  Alessandro Senes,et al.  A frequent, GxxxG-mediated, transmembrane association motif is optimized for the formation of interhelical Cα–H hydrogen bonds , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  B. Berger,et al.  MultiCoil: A program for predicting two‐and three‐stranded coiled coils , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Michael Bunce,et al.  Correction for Barth et al., Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Sivaraman Balakrishnan,et al.  Learning generative models for protein fold families , 2011, Proteins.

[8]  I. Arkin,et al.  Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane‐spanning protein helices , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  E. Aurell,et al.  Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Maria M. Lopez,et al.  Familial Alzheimer’s mutations within APPTM increase Aβ42 production by enhancing accessibility of ε-cleavage site , 2014, Nature Communications.

[11]  James H. Prestegard,et al.  A Transmembrane Helix Dimer: Structure and Implications , 1997, Science.

[12]  O. Bocharova,et al.  Dimeric structure of transmembrane domain of amyloid precursor protein in micellar environment , 2012, FEBS letters.

[13]  J. Chou,et al.  Solution structure and functional analysis of the influenza B proton channel , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[14]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Mechanism for Activation of the EGF Receptor Catalytic Domain by the Juxtamembrane Segment , 2009, Cell.

[15]  Shigeyuki Yokoyama,et al.  Structural Evidence for Loose Linkage between Ligand Binding and Kinase Activation in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  James J. Chou,et al.  The Structure of the ζζ Transmembrane Dimer Reveals Features Essential for Its Assembly with the T Cell Receptor , 2006, Cell.

[17]  Anton Arkhipov,et al.  Architecture and Membrane Interactions of the EGF Receptor , 2013, Cell.

[18]  Patrick Barth,et al.  Naturally evolved G protein-coupled receptors adopt metastable conformations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Cinque S. Soto,et al.  A photon-free approach to transmembrane protein structure determination. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Anton A Polyansky,et al.  Hydrophobic Matching Controls the Tilt and Stability of the Dimeric Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor (PDGFR) β Transmembrane Segment* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Jia-Huai Wang,et al.  Structural basis for dimerization of ICAM-1 on the cell surface. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[22]  David Baker,et al.  High-Resolution Modeling of Transmembrane Helical Protein Structures from Distant Homologues , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  O. Bocharova,et al.  Spatial structure of the transmembrane domain heterodimer of ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinases. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  D. Baker,et al.  Robust and accurate prediction of residue–residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information , 2014, eLife.

[25]  John Kuriyan,et al.  An Allosteric Mechanism for Activation of the Kinase Domain of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor , 2006, Cell.

[26]  Thomas A. Hopf,et al.  Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Massimiliano Pontil,et al.  PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments , 2012, Bioinform..

[28]  K. Hristova,et al.  FGFR3 dimer stabilization due to a single amino acid pathogenic mutation. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Chungho Kim,et al.  The structure of the integrin αIIbβ3 transmembrane complex explains integrin transmembrane signalling , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[30]  C. Pecquet,et al.  Tryptophan at the transmembrane–cytosolic junction modulates thrombopoietin receptor dimerization and activation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J. Demoulin,et al.  New insights into the mechanisms of hematopoietic cell transformation by activated receptor tyrosine kinases. , 2010, Blood.

[32]  Roman G. Efremov,et al.  Unique Dimeric Structure of BNip3 Transmembrane Domain Suggests Membrane Permeabilization as a Cell Death Trigger* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  K. Mineev,et al.  Spatial structure and dimer--monomer equilibrium of the ErbB3 transmembrane domain in DPC micelles. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[34]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 2000, Cell.

[35]  Raphaël Guerois,et al.  Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Coevolutionary signals across protein lineages help capture multiple protein conformations , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  A. Biegert,et al.  HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment , 2011, Nature Methods.

[38]  Timothy Nugent,et al.  Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Donald M. Engelman,et al.  Dynamic Helix Interactions in Transmembrane Signaling , 2006, Cell.

[40]  Sebastian Kube,et al.  Homotypic interaction and amino acid distribution of unilaterally conserved transmembrane helices. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Thomas A. Hopf,et al.  Three-Dimensional Structures of Membrane Proteins from Genomic Sequencing , 2012, Cell.

[42]  D. Baker,et al.  Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue–residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  A. Sali,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.

[44]  Jie Liang,et al.  Prediction of transmembrane helix orientation in polytopic membrane proteins , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.

[45]  J. Chou,et al.  The structural basis for intramembrane assembly of an activating immunoreceptor complex , 2010, Nature Immunology.

[46]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  High-resolution protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  D. Shaw,et al.  Conformational Coupling across the Plasma Membrane in Activation of the EGF Receptor , 2013, Cell.

[48]  C. Sander,et al.  Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Vikas Nanda,et al.  Structural basis for the function and inhibition of an influenza virus proton channel , 2008, Nature.

[50]  Alexander S. Arseniev,et al.  Structure of FGFR3 transmembrane domain dimer: implications for signaling and human pathologies. , 2013, Structure.

[51]  Martin Weigt,et al.  Structural basis of histidine kinase autophosphorylation deduced by integrating genomics, molecular dynamics, and mutagenesis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Johannes Söding,et al.  The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[53]  Alexander S. Arseniev,et al.  Supplemental Information Structure of FGFR 3 Transmembrane Domain Dimer : Implications for Signaling and Human Pathologies , 2013 .

[54]  E. N. Tkach,et al.  Left-handed dimer of EphA2 transmembrane domain: Helix packing diversity among receptor tyrosine kinases. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[55]  K. MacKenzie,et al.  Structural basis for dimerization of the BNIP3 transmembrane domain. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[56]  D Baker,et al.  Prediction of membrane protein structures with complex topologies using limited constraints , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Chris Bailey-Kellogg,et al.  Graphical Models of Residue Coupling in Protein Families , 2008, IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform..

[58]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Protein-protein interactions in the membrane: sequence, structural, and biological motifs. , 2008, Structure.

[59]  David Baker,et al.  The structure of a receptor with two associating transmembrane domains on the cell surface: integrin alphaIIbbeta3. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[60]  G. Veglia,et al.  Structural topology of phospholamban pentamer in lipid bilayers by a hybrid solution and solid-state NMR method , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Anton A Polyansky,et al.  Multistate organization of transmembrane helical protein dimers governed by the host membrane. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[62]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Helix-packing motifs in membrane proteins , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Roman G. Efremov,et al.  Spatial Structure of the Dimeric Transmembrane Domain of the Growth Factor Receptor ErbB2 Presumably Corresponding to the Receptor Active State* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  J. Chou,et al.  The structure of the zetazeta transmembrane dimer reveals features essential for its assembly with the T cell receptor. , 2006, Cell.

[65]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 1993 .

[66]  David Baker,et al.  Role of the Biomolecular Energy Gap in Protein Design, Structure, and Evolution , 2012, Cell.

[67]  Benjamin G. Levine,et al.  Structure and mechanism of proton transport through the transmembrane tetrameric M2 protein bundle of the influenza A virus , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  M. V. Goncharuk,et al.  Structural and thermodynamic insight into the process of "weak" dimerization of the ErbB4 transmembrane domain by solution NMR. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[69]  P. Stenson,et al.  The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and Its Exploitation in the Fields of Personalized Genomics and Molecular Evolution , 2012, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[70]  Arne Elofsson,et al.  OCTOPUS: improving topology prediction by two-track ANN-based preference scores and an extended topological grammar , 2008, Bioinform..

[71]  Gregory A Caputo,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Computational Design of Peptides That Target Transmembrane Helices , 2007 .

[72]  Roman G. Efremov,et al.  Spatial Structure and pH-dependent Conformational Diversity of Dimeric Transmembrane Domain of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase EphA1* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[73]  D. Baker,et al.  Simultaneous prediction of protein folding and docking at high resolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.