Pharmacy benefit management, cost-effectiveness analysis and drug formulary decisions.

Pharmacy benefit management companies (PBMs) have evolved over the past decade in response to the increased demand for health care cost containment. Their activities include the implementation of drug formularies and the negotiation of rebates from manufacturers. Our analysis of this industry is based on interviews and materials provided by the top five ranked PBM companies which account for over 80% of beneficiaries covered within formulary plans. The formularies of these companies are relatively inclusive, but they are becoming more restrictive over time. At present the use of cost-effectiveness (C-E) studies in the formulary decisions of PBMs has been limited. In this regard, the surveyed PBMs emphasized that most C-E studies have not compared therapeutic substitutes in populations with characteristics that are similar to those of their clients. Pharmacy benefit management companies also have had strong incentives to focus narrowly on drug costs because they typically manage drug benefits on a "carved-out" basis. However, PBMs anticipate a growing future role in the integrated management of patient care (disease management) for certain high cost chronic diseases and conditions. All of the leading firms we surveyed have disease management programs in development. The importance of C-E studies to PBM decisions is expected to increase significantly as disease management programs are implemented. The data infrastructure inherent to the PBM industry and the increasing number of employees with advanced training in pharmacoeconomics will permit firms to perform their own internal C-E studies. They are also establishing various alliances and joint ventures with drug manufacturers, health maintenance organizations, and academic institutions to perform these analyses. The leading PBMs tend to favor active participation in the development of methodological approaches to C-E studies over government regulations such as those proposed by the FDA in 1995.

[1]  H. Grabowski,et al.  Returns to R&D on new drug introductions in the 1980s. , 1994, Journal of health economics.

[2]  Alfred O. Berg,et al.  Clinical Guidelines And Primary Care Guidelines For The Diagnosis And Management Of Asthma , 2012 .

[3]  Ronald M. Lauer,et al.  National Cholesterol Education Program. Report of the Expert Panel on Population Strategies for Blood Cholesterol Reduction: executive summary. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  P. Kongstvedt,et al.  The Managed health care handbook , 1998 .

[5]  A. Towse Industrial Policy and the Pharmaceutical Industry , 1995 .

[6]  K. Schulman,et al.  Reducing high blood cholesterol level with drugs. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic management. , 1990, JAMA.

[7]  F. Rutten,et al.  Cost effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy in The Netherlands. Simvastatin versus cholestyramine. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Gotto,et al.  An economic evaluation of lovastatin for cholesterol lowering and coronary artery disease reduction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  G. Oster,et al.  Cholesterol-reduction intervention study (CRIS): a randomized trial to assess effectiveness and costs in clinical practice. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  L. Goldman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 1991, JAMA.

[11]  H. Grabowski,et al.  Longer Patents for Increased Generic Competition: The Waxman-Hatch Act after One Decade , 1997 .

[12]  L. Wilkins National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). , 1994 .

[13]  Daniel Steinberg,et al.  Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. The Expert Panel. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  M. Drummond,et al.  Does expenditure on pharmaceuticals give good value for money?: current evidence and policy implications. , 1993, Health policy.

[15]  H. Grabowski Medicaid patients' access to new drugs. , 1988, Health affairs.

[16]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  Brand Loyalty, Entry, and Price Competition in Pharmaceuticals after the 1984 Drug Act , 1992, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[17]  P. Benfield,et al.  Misoprostol , 1993, PharmacoEconomics.