Age differences in the influence of metrical structure on phonetic identification

Two phonetic identification experiments were conducted with two groups of participants: a young adult group and an older adult group. In Experiment 1, subjects were required to make voiced-voiceless decisions for initial alveolar stop consonants to stimuli along two voice onset time (VOT) continua--one ranging from "di'gress" to "ti'gress" and the other from "'digress" to "'tigress" (i.e., in one continuum, the voiced endpoint was consistent with the word's stress pattern while in the other continuum, the voiceless endpoint was consistent with the word's stress pattern). Results revealed that both groups of participants were influenced by the stress pattern of the stimuli, but stress seemed to override VOT cues for a large number of the older individuals. To confirm that the effect was not simply due to a lexical influence, a follow-up experiment utilized two word-nonword continua ("diamond-tiamond" and "diming-timing") to examine the magnitude of lexical effects in these subject groups. Typical lexical status effects emerged for both young and older adults which were smaller than the effects of stress pattern found in Experiment 1. The findings are discussed with respect to the role of prosodic context in language processing in aging.

[1]  L E Humes,et al.  Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[3]  B. Meyer,et al.  Information recalled from prose by young, middle, and old adult readers. , 1980, Experimental aging research.

[4]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Effect of Lexical Status on Phonetic Categorization , 1984 .

[6]  R. S. Waldstein,et al.  The Role of Lexical Status on the Phonetic Categorization of Speech in Aphasia , 1994, Brain and Language.

[7]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion , 1992 .

[9]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Deborah M. Burke,et al.  Language, memory, and aging: Subject index , 1988 .

[11]  Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987 .

[12]  S. Baum,et al.  The Influence of Neighborhood Density on Phonetic Categorization in Aphasia , 1999, Brain and Language.

[13]  D. Caplan,et al.  Selective acoustic phonetic impairment and lexical access in an aphasic patient. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G. Cohen,et al.  Does ‘elderspeak’ work? the effect of intonation and stress on comprehension and recall of spoken discourse in old age , 1986 .

[15]  George A. Talland Human aging and behavior : recent advances in research and theory , 1968 .

[16]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[18]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A Wingfield,et al.  Speech-processing capacity in young and older adults: a dual-task study. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[20]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Age and decision strategies in running memory for speech: effects of prosody and linguistic structure. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[22]  A. Samuel CHAPTER 3 – The Role of the Lexicon in Speech Perception* , 1986 .

[23]  A Wingfield,et al.  Adult age differences in the use of prosody for syntactic parsing and recall of spoken sentences. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[24]  A Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[25]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Older adults can inhibit high-probability competitors in speech recognition , 1994 .

[26]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  Pattern recognition by humans and machines , 1986 .

[27]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  J A Nevin,et al.  The effects of context and feedback on age differences in spoken word recognition. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[29]  C. Connine Modularity and auditory word recognition. , 1986 .

[30]  M. Sommers,et al.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[31]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[32]  J. McQueen The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  A G Samuel,et al.  An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Word onset gating and linguistic context in spoken word recognition by young and elderly adults. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[35]  G. Cohen,et al.  Word recognition: age differences in contextual facilitation effects. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[36]  H. Taub Comprehension and memory of prose materials by young and old adults. , 1979, Experimental aging research.

[37]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[38]  K. Snell,et al.  Age-related changes in temporal gap detection. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: the role of acoustic structure. , 1989 .