Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach

The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) has declared that to achieve accredited status, “engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.” Many engineering professors struggle to integrate this required ethics instruction in technical classes and projects because of the lack of a formalized ethics-in-design approach. However, one methodology developed in human-computer interaction research, the Value-Sensitive Design approach, can serve as an engineering education tool which bridges the gap between design and ethics for many engineering disciplines. The three major components of Value-Sensitive Design, conceptual, technical, and empirical, exemplified through a case study which focuses on the development of a command and control supervisory interface for a military cruise missile.

[1]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human agency and responsible computing: Implications for computer system design , 1992, J. Syst. Softw..

[2]  W. W. Royce,et al.  Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques , 1987, ICSE '87.

[3]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .

[4]  James A. Landay,et al.  High-Fidelity or Low-Fidelity, Paper or Computer? Choosing Attributes when Testing Web Prototypes , 2002 .

[5]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Design of a Cooperative Problem-Solving System for En-Route Flight Planning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994 .

[6]  James Brown Scott.  The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907 , 2007 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[8]  W. V. O'brien,et al.  The Conduct of Just and Limited War. , 1982, American Journal of International Law.

[9]  Kathleen L. Mosier,et al.  Does automation bias decision-making? , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  A spiral model of software development and enhancement , 1986, Computer.

[11]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-Sensitive Design: A Research Agenda for Information Technology , 1999 .

[12]  W. J. Davis,et al.  Rethinking Capstone Courses in Civil Engineering: A Response to ABET 2003-2004 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs , 2004 .

[13]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Supporting Decision Making and Action Selection under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[14]  K. Mosier,et al.  Human Decision Makers and Automated Decision Aids: Made for Each Other? , 1996 .

[15]  R. L. Holmes,et al.  On war and morality , 1992 .

[16]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[17]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[18]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Bias in computer systems , 1996, TOIS.

[19]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[20]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models , 2000, Ergonomics.

[21]  Unger,et al.  Controlling Technology , 1982 .

[22]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[23]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[24]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Globalizing engineering ethics education through Web-based instruction , 2004, 2004 International Symposium on Technology and Society (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37548).