Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance?

To date, efforts to understand virtual teaming have been largely anecdotal and atheoretical. Therefore, drawing from the extant research in the groups domain, we attempt to ground the definition of a virtual team in well-established group-level constructs, and design a simulation study to investigate the impact of different virtual team characteristics on team performance. Essentially, we argue that the virtual team is defined by three key characteristics—the virtual team context, the virtual team composition, and the virtual team structure. Using the VDT computational discrete event simulation model as our experimental platform, we simulated different virtual team models, and examined their impact on various team performance dimensions. We found that virtual team characteristics have different effects on different aspects of team performance. The virtual context team had a lower rework volume but higher coordination volume and longer project duration than the virtual composition team. Interestingly, we also found that the virtual structure team performed better than the software development team baseline model in all aspects of team performance. Based on these results, we proposed strategies to improve performance in different types of virtual team. Specifically, we propose (1) increasing the ease of communication and availability of routines in the virtual context team; (2) clarifying role expectations and fostering a team culture in the virtual composition team; and (3) implementing a lateral structure in the virtual team. Our results also suggest that firms should consider situational demands, specifically tolerance for errors and coordination volume, when considering the design of virtual teams.

[1]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[2]  D. Laskin Dealing with information overload. , 1994, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  K. Roberts Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[4]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Communication and Coordination in the Virtual Office , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[6]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[7]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[8]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[9]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[10]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[11]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[12]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[13]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Virtual organization: toward a theory of societal transformation stimulated by information technology , 2003, UBIQ.

[14]  Børge Obel,et al.  The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[15]  YAN JIN,et al.  The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[16]  John M. Levine,et al.  Culture and socialization in work groups , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[17]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  The Virtual Organization: Bureaucracy, Technology, and the Implosion of Control , 1994 .

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[19]  KieslerSara,et al.  Reducing Social Context Cues , 1986 .

[20]  George F. Kimmerling A Licensing Primer for Trainers. , 1997 .

[21]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[22]  Charles M. Savage Fifth generation management : co-creating through virtual enterprising, dynamic teaming and knowledge networking , 1996 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload , 1985, CACM.

[24]  R. Kraut Predicting the use of technology: the case of telework , 1994 .

[25]  M. Malone The Virtual Corporation , 1993 .

[26]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[27]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[28]  Yan Jin,et al.  The “virtual design team”: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance , 1994 .

[29]  John M. Montgomery The Latest Word from Thoughtful Executives , 1994 .

[30]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[31]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[32]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[33]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[34]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual Organization: A Vision of Management in the Information Age , 1994, Inf. Soc..

[35]  Jörgen Hansson,et al.  Virtual organizations and beyond - discover imaginary systems , 2001, Wiley series in practical strategy.

[36]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[37]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[38]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.

[39]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[40]  C. Handy Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  N. Lin,et al.  Social structure and network analysis , 1985 .

[43]  C. O'Reilly Individuals and Information Overload in Organizations: Is More Necessarily Better? , 1980 .

[44]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[45]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers''belief structures and informatio , 1988 .