Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

A site-specific recombination system that probes the relative probabilities that pairs of chromosomal loci collide with one another in living cells of budding yeast was used to explore the relative contributions of pairing, recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and telomere clustering to the close juxtaposition of homologous chromosome pairs during meiosis. The level of Cre-mediated recombination between a pair of loxP sites located at an allelic position on homologous chromosomes was 13-fold greater than that between a pair of loxP sites located at ectopic positions on nonhomologous chromosomes. Mutations affecting meiotic recombination initiation and the processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) into single-end invasions (SEIs) reduced the levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination levels by three- to sixfold. The severity of Cre/loxP phenotypes is presented in contrast to relatively weak DSB-independent pairing defects as assayed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for these mutants. Mutations affecting synaptonemal complex (SC) formation or crossover control gave wild-type levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination. A delay in attaining maximum levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination was observed for a mutant defective in telomere clustering. None of the mutants affected ectopic levels of recombination. These data suggest that stable, close homolog juxtaposition in yeast is distinct from pre-DSB pairing interactions, requires both DSB and SEI formation, but does not depend on crossovers or SC.

[1]  N. Kleckner,et al.  The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. , 1998, Annual review of genetics.

[2]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. , 1999, Genes & development.

[3]  G. Roeder,et al.  The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S. cerevisiae Ensures Synapsis between Homologous Chromosomes , 1998, Cell.

[4]  P. Philippsen,et al.  New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Yeast.

[5]  J. Sedat,et al.  Mapping three-dimensional chromosome architecture in situ. , 1998, Methods in Cell Biology.

[6]  G. Roeder,et al.  Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein , 1994, Cell.

[7]  G. Roeder.  Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. , 1997, Genes & development.

[8]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Interhomolog Bias during Meiotic Recombination: Meiotic Functions Promote a Highly Differentiated Interhomolog-Only Pathway , 1997, Cell.

[9]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[10]  A. Eggleston,et al.  HOMOLOGOUS PAIRING AND , 1994 .

[11]  M. J. Neale,et al.  Wild-type levels of Spo11-induced DSBs are required for normal single-strand resection during meiosis. , 2002, Molecules and Cells.

[12]  L. Anderson,et al.  Nodules associated with axial cores and synaptonemal complexes during zygotene in Psilotum nudum , 1988, Chromosoma.

[13]  N. Kleckner,et al.  DMC1: A meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression , 1992, Cell.

[14]  S M Kane,et al.  Carbohydrate Metabolism During Ascospore Development in Yeast , 1974, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  R. Padmore,et al.  Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae , 1991, Cell.

[16]  L. Enquist,et al.  Site-specific insertion of DNA into a pseudorabies virus vector. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  G. Roeder,et al.  Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. , 1997, Genes & development.

[18]  S. Keeney,et al.  Functional interactions between SPO11 and REC102 during initiation of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Genetics.

[19]  P. Brown,et al.  Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  G. Berben,et al.  The YDp plasmids: A uniform set of vectors bearing versatile gene disruption cassettes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1991, Yeast.

[21]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  A Method for Gene Disruption That Allows Repeated Use of URA3 Selection in the Construction of Multiply Disrupted Yeast Strains , 1987, Genetics.

[22]  R. Pearlman,et al.  Rad51 and Dmc1 Form Mixed Complexes Associated with Mouse Meiotic Chromosome Cores and Synaptonemal Complexes , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  D. Pittman,et al.  Analysis of meiotic recombination pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genetics.

[24]  S. Keeney,et al.  Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. , 2001, Current topics in developmental biology.

[25]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Identification of double holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination , 1995, Cell.

[26]  S. Keeney,et al.  Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p. , 2000, Genes & development.

[27]  J. Szostak,et al.  Extensive 3′-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site , 1991, Cell.

[28]  N. Kleckner,et al.  A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae , 1990, Cell.

[29]  R. E. Esposito,et al.  SPO13 negatively regulates the progression of mitotic and meiotic nuclear division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Genetics.

[30]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. , 1997, Genes & development.

[31]  R. Padmore,et al.  Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination , 1990, Cell.

[32]  S. Leem,et al.  The MRE4 gene encodes a novel protein kinase homologue required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  L. Xu,et al.  NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  S M Burgess,et al.  Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization. , 1999, Genes & development.

[35]  Harry Scherthan,et al.  Meiotic Telomere Protein Ndj1p Is Required for Meiosis-Specific Telomere Distribution, Bouquet Formation and Efficient Homologue Pairing , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  J. Haber,et al.  Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[37]  M. Conrad,et al.  Ndj1p, a meiotic telomere protein required for normal chromosome synapsis and segregation in yeast. , 1997, Science.

[38]  F. Sherman,et al.  Evidence for two types of allelic recombination in yeast. , 1963, Genetics.

[39]  R. Pearlman,et al.  Chromatin organization at meiosis , 1988, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  A. Villeneuve,et al.  Whence Meiosis? , 2001, Cell.

[41]  A S Goldman,et al.  Restriction of ectopic recombination by interhomolog interactions during Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  S. Burgess.  Homologous chromosome associations and nuclear order in meiotic and mitotically dividing cells of budding yeast. , 2002, Advances in genetics.

[43]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[44]  G. Roeder,et al.  ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis , 1993, Cell.

[45]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis , 1994, Cell.

[46]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  S. Bullard,et al.  Coordination of the initiation of recombination and the reductional division in meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1999, Genetics.

[48]  G. Roeder,et al.  Heteroduplex DNA formation and homolog pairing in yeast meiotic mutants. , 1995, Genetics.

[49]  G. Simchen,et al.  Switching yeast from meiosis to mitosis: double‐strand break repair, recombination and synaptonemal complex , 1997, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[50]  R. Hawley,et al.  Hanging on to your homolog: the roles of pairing, synapsis and recombination in the maintenance of homolog adhesion , 2000, Chromosoma.

[51]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast , 1994, Cell.

[52]  A. Nicolas,et al.  An atypical topoisomerase II from archaea with implications for meiotic recombination , 1997, Nature.

[53]  Y. Kassir,et al.  A meiosis-specific protein kinase, Ime2, is required for the correct timing of DNA replication and for spore formation in yeast meiosis , 1996, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[54]  D. K. Bishop.  RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis , 1994, Cell.

[55]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Three-Dimensional Microscopy of the Rad51 Recombination Protein during Meiotic Prophase , 1999, Plant Cell.

[56]  N. M. Hollingsworth,et al.  MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. , 1995, Genes & development.

[57]  G. H. Jones,et al.  Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum , 1987, Chromosoma.

[58]  S. Keeney,et al.  Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family , 1997, Cell.

[59]  T. Allers,et al.  Differential Timing and Control of Noncrossover and Crossover Recombination during Meiosis , 2001, Cell.

[60]  R. E. Esposito,et al.  Genetic recombination and commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Roeder Gs.  Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango , 1997 .

[62]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Bouquet formation in budding yeast: initiation of recombination is not required for meiotic telomere clustering. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[63]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.

[64]  S. Bullard,et al.  Double strand breaks at the HIS2 recombination hot spot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Luis Aragón-Alcaide,et al.  Functional dissection of in vivo interchromosome association in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[66]  N. Kleckner,et al.  The Single-End Invasion An Asymmetric Intermediate at the Double-Strand Break to Double-Holliday Junction Transition of Meiotic Recombination , 2001, Cell.

[67]  G. Roeder,et al.  Roles for two RecA homologs in promoting meiotic chromosome synapsis. , 1995, Genes & development.