Antibiotic Effect on Planktonic and Biofilm-Producing Staphylococci

The pathogenic effect of Staphylococci is due to extra-cellular factors and properties such as adherence and biofilm production. The nature of the biofilm and the physiological properties of biofilm-producing bacteria result in an inherent antibiotic resistance and require further investigation. Two hundred and sixty Staphylococcal strains were cultured from 600 clinical specimens obtained from hospitalized patients. Among these, 155 were identified as coagulase-positive (CPS) and 105 as coagulase-negative (CNS) staphylococci. Staphylococcal strains were tested for biofilm production using the tissue culture plate (TCP) method. TCP detection showed that of the 155 CPS, 124 (80%) were biofilm producers, while 63 (60%) of the 105 CNS were biofilm producers. Biofilm-producing strains were scanned by scanning electron microscope (SEM) to confirm biofilm formation, study biofilm production, and examine antibiotic effects on biofilm formation. Disc diffusion method was used to study resistance of planktonic and biofilm-forming cells to antibiotics. Planktonic cells were less resistant to antibiotics than biofilm-forming cells. Microbroth dilution method and a new BioTimer assay were used to determine antibiotic MICs affecting planktonic and biofilm cells. Both methods showed that the MICs for planktonic cells were less than that for biofilm cells. The BioTimer assay was therefore found to be sensitive, accurate, and reliable, with results in agreement with those from the broth dilution method and SEM.

[1]  T. Shunmugaperumal Biofilm Eradication and Prevention: A Pharmaceutical Approach to Medical Device Infections , 2010 .

[2]  L. Baddour,et al.  Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices , 1985, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  M. Cunha,et al.  Comparison of methods for the detection of biofilm production in coagulase-negative staphylococci , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[4]  N. Høiby,et al.  Eradication of early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. , 2005, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[5]  K. Lewis,et al.  Riddle of Biofilm Resistance , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  A. Horswill,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal , 2014, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol..

[7]  R. Losick,et al.  The Extracellular Matrix of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Comprises Cytoplasmic Proteins That Associate with the Cell Surface in Response to Decreasing pH , 2014, mBio.

[8]  Meera Sharma,et al.  Role of persisters and small-colony variants in antibiotic resistance of planktonic and biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro study. , 2009, Journal of medical microbiology.

[9]  W. Kloos,et al.  Identification of Staphylococcus Species with the API STAPH-IDENT System , 1983, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  S. Stepanović,et al.  Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci , 2007, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[11]  L. Coltella,et al.  BioTimer Assay, a new method for counting Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm without sample manipulation applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm. , 2008, Journal of microbiological methods.

[12]  Thomas Bjarnsholt,et al.  Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. , 2010, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[13]  Timothy J. Foster,et al.  Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[14]  P. Valenti,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of bacteria adherent to polyelectrolyte HEMA-based hydrogels. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  M. Magnani,et al.  Biofilm-forming and antimicrobial resistance traits of staphylococci isolated from goat dairy plants. , 2016, Journal of infection in developing countries.

[16]  M. L. Cabo,et al.  Adhesion and detachment kinetics of several strains of Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus under three different experimental conditions. , 2007, Food microbiology.

[17]  Y. Dufrêne,et al.  Molecular interactions and inhibition of the staphylococcal biofilm-forming protein SdrC , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  T. Fatma,et al.  Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of Staphylococci: an evaluation of three different screening methods. , 2006, Indian journal of medical microbiology.

[19]  P. Chaudhari,et al.  Effect of biologically synthesised silver nanoparticles on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm quenching and prevention of biofilm formation. , 2012, IET nanobiotechnology.

[20]  J. Leiva,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms developed in vitro. , 1999, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[21]  S. Cameotra,et al.  Anti-biofilm efficacy of silver nanoparticles against MRSA and MRSE isolated from wounds in a tertiary care hospital , 2015, Indian journal of medical microbiology.

[22]  Q. Saquib,et al.  Gum arabic capped‐silver nanoparticles inhibit biofilm formation by multi‐drug resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2014, Journal of basic microbiology.

[23]  A broad-spectrum anti-biofilm peptide enhances antibiotic action , 2014 .