Simulation of human respiration in fMRI with a mechanical model

Obtaining functional magnetic resonance images of the brain is a challenging measurement process having a low characteristic signal-to-noise ratio. Images contain various forms of noise, including those induced by physiologic processes. One of the prevalent disturbances is hypothesized to result from susceptibility fluctuations caused by abdominal volume changes during respiration. To test this hypothesis and characterize the contribution of respiration noise to both magnitude and phase images, a mechanical model of a respiring human was constructed. The model was tested by comparing data from the model with that of a resting human. Power spectrum analyses show that the model induces both phase and magnitude disturbances similar to those in the human. The disturbances are directly related to the frequency of the respiration, with the noise most prevalent in the phase images. Though magnitude image noise is hard to identify in the human, the manikin demonstrates the presence of this disturbance. The construction of the manikin rules out motion as the primary source of the observed fluctuations and variation of the electrical properties of the manikin also indicates that signal fluctuations are not primarily due to eddy currents. Therefore, the changes are most probably induced by bulk susceptibility changes correlating with respiration.

[1]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Reduction of physiological fluctuations in fMRI using digital filters , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  X. Hu,et al.  Reduction of signal fluctuation in functional MRI using navigator echoes , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  J. Saunders,et al.  k‐space detection and correction of physiological artifacts in fMRI , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[6]  A. Anderson,et al.  Respiratory effects in human functional magnetic resonance imaging due to bulk susceptibility changes. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Alexander V. Kildishev,et al.  Interactions of magnetic resonance imaging radio frequency magnetic fields with elongated medical implants , 2000 .

[9]  T. W. Athey,et al.  Dielectric properties of animal tissues in vivo at frequencies 10 MHz--1 GHz. , 1981, Bioelectromagnetics.

[10]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological artifacts in fMRI by direct extraction of physiological activity from MR data , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  A Jesmanowicz,et al.  Artifacts in functional magnetic resonance imaging from gaseous oxygen , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  Impact of signal‐to‐noise on functional MRI , 2000 .

[14]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Brain parenchyma motion: measurement with cine echo-planar MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[15]  R. Buxton,et al.  Estimation of respiration‐induced noise fluctuations from undersampled multislice fMRI data † , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. D. Munck,et al.  The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. , 1999, Physiological measurement.