Multiparametric MRI and prostate cancer diagnosis and risk stratification

Purpose of review Prostate cancer is the most common solid organ cancer type among American men. Screening and imaging aim to detect early-stage disease that is biologically aggressive. The focus of this study is to review multiparametric MRI in the detection and risk stratification of prostate cancer. Recent findings MP-MRI has been shown to be the most accurate noninvasive technique to localize prostate cancer. Recent studies reported that using MRI for guidance during prostate biopsies increases the yield of prostate biopsies. Moreover, multiparametric and particular MRI sequences such as apparent diffusion coefficient values of diffusion-weighted MRI have been found to correlate negatively with tumor Gleason scores. Summary Among the existing imaging modalities, multiplanar magnetic resonance is the best at detecting prostate cancers. Some risk stratification is possible based on size, extent and apparent diffusion coefficient values. However, prostate MRI remains nonspecific and biopsies must be performed to confirm whether an abnormality is benign or malignant and to assign Gleason scores.

[1]  Robert E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results. , 2007, Radiology.

[2]  Jun Nakashima,et al.  Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer. , 2004, Urology.

[3]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  J. Melamed,et al.  Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[5]  A. Oto,et al.  Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. , 2011, Radiology.

[7]  Silvia D. Chang,et al.  Prostate cancer tumor volume: measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? , 2011, Radiology.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  H. Hricak,et al.  Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  Stefan A Reinsberg,et al.  Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  A. Wetter,et al.  Combined MRI and MR spectroscopy of the prostate before radical prostatectomy. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[14]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy--results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  P. Choyke,et al.  D'Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[17]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  P. Choyke,et al.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation. , 2010, Radiology.

[20]  Marcelino Bernardo,et al.  MRI of localized prostate cancer: coming of age in the PSA era. , 2012, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[21]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. , 2012, European urology.

[22]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[23]  Olivier Rouvière,et al.  Recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: value of contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI in localizing intraprostatic tumor--correlation with biopsy findings. , 2004, Urology.

[24]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Diffusion Imaging of the Prostate at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Evis Sala,et al.  Endorectal MR imaging before salvage prostatectomy: tumor localization and staging. , 2006, Radiology.

[26]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. , 2005, Radiology.

[27]  J. Machan,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Incremental value of diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation treatment: preliminary results , 2011, European Radiology.

[30]  C. Catalano,et al.  Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[31]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[32]  Jason A Koutcher,et al.  Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings. , 2008, Radiology.

[33]  Evis Sala,et al.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[34]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours , 2012, European Radiology.

[35]  A. Villers,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[36]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. , 2004, Radiology.

[37]  Byung Kwan Park,et al.  Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Location at 3T Using a Phased-Array Coil: Preliminary Results , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[38]  H. Ahlström,et al.  Two-dimensional spectroscopic imaging for pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer: comparison with the step-section histology after radical prostatectomy. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.