Lateral transmission of tension in frog myofibers: A myofibrillar network and transverse cytoskeletal connections are possible transmitters

The extensibility of the sarcolemma of single myofibers can be reduced locally by leaving a segment covered by a sleeve of surrounding tissue composed of cut myofibers, blood vessels, and connective tissue, hereafter referred to as “the splint.” Splinted fibers from frog semitendinosus muscle were used to study mechanical connections (transverse coupling) between myofibrillar components and sarcolemma. The transverse coupling is strong enough to insure a tight correlation between myofibril length and overlying sarcolemma length in both resting and activated fibers and to transmit nearly maximum isometric tension to the splint. Lateral transmission of active tension was demonstrated with a preparation which had the distal two‐thirds of an intact fiber covered by a splint and the proximal third dissected clean. When the outer end of the splint was pinned down and only the distal tendon was held, tension generated in the splinted fiber was transmitted to, and recorded from, the splint. Parameters of isometric tension transmitted laterally were not significantly different from those of tension transmitted longitudinally. Myofibrils branch profusely and form a network that may act as a unitary force generator and transmitter. In splinted fibers its output is possibly picked up circumferentially and transmitted across the sarcolemma by a microfilament network. A cap of relatively inextensible sarcolemma “splints” myofiber ends. Resting tension is transmitted to and from the myofibrils by transverse coupling beyond the cap and the region of short sarcomere spacing it covers. Transverse cytoskeletal connections at Z and M regions are described. Immobilization of the sarcolemma allows study of myofibril‐sarcolemma linkage in intact libers. Both active and resting tension were transmitted laterally.

[1]  H. Huxley Evidence for Continuity Between the Central Elements of the Triads and Extracellular Space in Frog Sartorius Muscle , 1964, Nature.

[2]  L. M. Brown,et al.  Mercuric chloride in alcohol and chloroform used as a rapidly acting fixative for contracting muscle fibres , 1982, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  T. Robinson,et al.  A variety of intercellular connections in heart muscle. , 1981, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[4]  F. Julian,et al.  Sarcomere length non-uniformity in relation to tetanic responses of stretched skeletal muscle fibres , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  S. Rapoport,et al.  Mechanical Properties of the Sarcolemma and Myoplasm in Frog Muscle as a Function of Sarcomere Length , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[6]  R. Moss,et al.  Elastic and viscous properties of resting frog skeletal muscle. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[7]  A. Huxley,et al.  The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate striated muscle , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  C. Casella,et al.  Tensile force in total striated muscle, isolated fibre and sarcolemma. , 1950, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  G. Goldspink,et al.  Longitudinal growth of striated muscle fibres. , 1971, Journal of cell science.

[10]  A. Huxley,et al.  Tension development in highly stretched vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  K. Maruyama,et al.  Connectin, an elastic protein of muscle. Identification of "titin" with connectin. , 1981, Journal of biochemistry.

[12]  A. Mauro,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF THE SARCOLEMMA OF THE FROG SKELETAL MUSCLE FIBER , 1961, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[13]  R. Ramsey,et al.  Sarcolemma: Transmitter of Active Tension in Frog Skeletal Muscle , 1965, Science.

[14]  O. Sten-Knudsen,et al.  The time course of the latency relaxation as a function of the sarcomere length in frog and mammalian muscle. , 1979, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  L. Mulieri The dependence of the latency relaxation on sarcomere length and other characteristics of isolated muscle fibres , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  A. Huxley,et al.  Structural Changes in Muscle During Contraction: Interference Microscopy of Living Muscle Fibres , 1954, Nature.

[17]  G. G. Knappeis,et al.  THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE M LINE IN SKELETAL MUSCLE , 1968, Journal of Cell Biology.

[18]  P. Luther,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the vertebrate muscle M-region. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  S. Rapoport The anisotropic elastic properties of the sarcolemma of the frog semitendinosus muscle fiber. , 1973, Biophysical journal.

[20]  R. J. Podolsky,et al.  The maximum sarcomere length for contraction of isolated myofibrils , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  F. Buchthal,et al.  ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE RESTING AND CONTRACTED STRIATED MUSCLE FIBER AT DIFFERENT DEGREES OF STRETCH , 1961, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[22]  Lee D. Peachey,et al.  THE SARCOPLASMIC RETICULUM AND TRANSVERSE TUBULES OF THE FROG'S SARTORIUS , 1965, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  H. Huxley,et al.  Changes in the Cross-Striations of Muscle during Contraction and Stretch and their Structural Interpretation , 1954, Nature.

[24]  D. Jones,et al.  Contractile properties of bundles of fiber segments from skeletal muscles. , 1982, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  R. Ramsey,et al.  The isometric length‐tension diagram of isolated skeletal muscle fibers of the frog , 1940 .

[26]  D. K. Hill,et al.  Tension due to interaction between the sliding filaments in resting striated muscle. the effect of stimulation , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  G H Pollack,et al.  The sarcomere length-tension relation in skeletal muscle , 1978, The Journal of General Physiology.

[28]  A. Huxley,et al.  Reflections on Muscle , 1981 .