No credit where credit is due: attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams.

In 3 experimental studies, the authors explored how ambiguity about the source of a successful joint performance outcome promotes attributional rationalization, negatively affecting evaluations of women. Participants read descriptions of a mixed-sex dyad's work and were asked to evaluate its male and female members. Results indicated that unless the ambiguity about individual contribution to the dyad's successful joint outcome was constrained by providing feedback about individual team member performance (Study 1) or by the way in which the task was said to have been structured (Study 2) or unless the negative expectations about women's performance were challenged by clear evidence of prior work competence (Study 3), female members were devalued as compared with their male counterparts-they were rated as being less competent, less influential, and less likely to have played a leadership role in work on the task. Implications of these results, both theoretical and practical, are discussed.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  D. Bakan.  The duality of human existence : an essay on psychology and religion , 1966 .

[3]  K. Deaux,et al.  Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. , 1974 .

[4]  G. O'Connor.  Small Groups , 1980 .

[5]  B. Gutek,et al.  Sex Effects on Evaluation , 1980 .

[6]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. , 1983 .

[7]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies☆ , 1988 .

[8]  M. Heilman,et al.  Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. , 1989 .

[9]  K. McGraw,et al.  A common language effect size statistic. , 1992 .

[10]  M. Heilman.  Special issue: Gender in the workplace. Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know , 1995 .

[11]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Special issue: Gender in the workplace. Sex stereotypes:: Do they influence perceptions of managers? , 1995 .

[12]  M. Heilman.  Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know. , 1995 .

[13]  K. Dodge,et al.  Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. , 1995 .

[14]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  He's Skilled, She's Lucky: A Meta-Analysis of Observers' Attributions for Women's and Men's Successes and Failures , 1996 .

[15]  G. Powell.  Reflections on the glass ceiling: Recent trends and future prospects. , 1999 .

[16]  D. Ilgen,et al.  The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development. Frontiers of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. , 1999 .

[17]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic Investigation , 2000 .

[18]  V. E. Schein.  A Global Look at Psychological Barriers to Women's Progress in Management , 2001 .

[19]  M. Heilman.  Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. , 2001 .

[20]  R. Silzer.  The 21st century executive : innovative practices for building leadership at the top , 2002 .

[21]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[22]  M. Heilman,et al.  Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.