Learning with Web Tools, Simulations, and Other Technologies in Science Classrooms

This position paper proposes the enhancement of teacher and student learning in science classrooms by tapping the enormous potential of information communication and technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools for engaging students in scientific inquiry. This paper serves to challenge teacher-held assumptions about students learning science ‘from technology’ with a framework and examples of students learning science ‘with technology’. Whereas a high percentage of students are finding their way in using ICTs outside of school, for the most part they currently are not doing so inside of school in ways that they find meaningful and relevant to their lives. Instead, the pedagogical approaches that are most often experienced are out-of-step with how students use ICTs outside of schools and are not supportive of learning framed by constructivism. Here we describe a theoretical and pedagogical foundation for better connecting the two worlds of students’ lives: life in school and life outside of school. This position paper is in response to the changing landscape of students’ lives. The position is transformative in nature because it proposes the use of cyber-enabled resources for cultivating and leveraging students new literacy skills by learning ‘with technology’ to enhance science learning.

[1]  M. Linn,et al.  How do technology‐enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? , 2010 .

[2]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[3]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[5]  Douglas A. Levin,et al.  The Digital Disconnect: The Widening Gap Between Internet-Savvy Students and Their Schools , 2002 .

[6]  Ahmet Aypay,et al.  Variation among Schools on Classroom Practices in Science Based on TIMSS-1999 in Turkey. , 2007 .

[7]  Frances A. Karnes,et al.  Methods and Materials for teaching the gifted , 2000 .

[8]  Raymond Hurst,et al.  Improving Science Classroom Instruction By Means of Constructivism and Technology , 2007 .

[9]  T. Campbell,et al.  Science Laboratory Experiences of High School Students across One State in the U.S.: Descriptive Research from the Classroom. , 2008 .

[10]  Ian M. Kinchin.  Why Professional Development Should Challenge Teachers' Core Beliefs , 2002 .

[11]  Becky Herr Stephenson,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out , 2010 .

[12]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  The impact of technology on the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast's sixth grade science classroom , 2007 .

[13]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences , 2003 .

[14]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? , 2003 .

[16]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications , 2008 .

[17]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computers As Cognitive Tools , 2020 .

[18]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[19]  N. Songer,et al.  Student Motivation and Internet Technology: Are Students Empowered to Learn Science? , 2000 .

[20]  Shiang-Kwei Wang,et al.  The Impact of Using Blogs on College Students' Reading Comprehension and Learning Motivation , 2010 .

[21]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[22]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[23]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[24]  Shiang-Kwei Wang,et al.  The exploration of New York City high school students' global literacy , 2010 .

[25]  S. Livingstone,et al.  UK Children Go Online : final report of key project findings , 2005 .

[26]  Sousan Arafeh,et al.  Writing, Technology and Teens , 2008 .

[27]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media , 2009 .

[28]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Ready, Set, SCIENCE!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms , 2007 .

[29]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[30]  Frederick Reif.  Applying Cognitive Science to Education: Thinking and Learning in Scientific and Other Complex Domains , 2008 .

[31]  Lane W. Clarke,et al.  Introduction: Technology and the evolving classroom. , 2010 .

[32]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[33]  William J. Kurmey.  The Impact of Technology , 1982 .

[34]  Sandra M. Webb,et al.  On (not) overcoming our history of hierarchy: Complexities of university/school collaboration , 2006 .

[35]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Confronting, Challenging, and Changing Teachers' Beliefs: Implications from a Local Systemic Change Professional Development Program , 2002 .

[36]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media . , 2010 .

[38]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Tools in Science Education: An Emerging Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Practice. , 2007 .

[39]  L. Mosley,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[40]  Chris Dede,et al.  Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum , 2000 .

[41]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[42]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[43]  G. Cziko,et al.  Teacher Adoption of Technology: A Perceptual Control Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[44]  Demythologizing or Dehumanizing? A Response to Settlage and the Ideals of Open Inquiry , 2008 .

[45]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  America's lab report : investigations in high school science , 2006 .

[46]  Larry Cuban.  Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[47]  Cathy Lewin,et al.  Broadening access to the curriculum through using technology to link home and school: a critical analysis of reforms intended to improve students' educational attainment , 2003 .

[48]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[49]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project , 2009 .

[50]  Chris Dede,et al.  Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning , 2009 .

[51]  S. Mumtaz.  Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature , 2000 .

[52]  Harry Singer,et al.  Theoretical models and processes of reading , 1976 .