The impact of surfer/seeker mode on the effectiveness of website characteristics

This research examines how two commercial website design variables, visual complexity and source of interactivity control, are more or less effective depending on a consumer’s purpose for visiting a website (consumer user mode). An online experiment was conducted in Singapore utilising over 70 experimental mock web pages. The authors find that goal-directed Seekers prefer a consumer-controlled interactive environment as well as a visually simple design, whereas experiential Surfers prefer marketer-controlled interactivity and a visually complex layout. This suggests that earlier research findings that supported both higher levels of interactivity and simplification of website format are in fact moderated by the user mode of the consumer. The study is also the first to empirically examine the distinction between consumer- and marketer-controlled forms of interactivity.

[1]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[2]  Ye Wang,et al.  The Web Motivation Inventory , 2007 .

[3]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Re-surfing W3: Research Perspectives on Marketing Communication and Buyer Behaviour on the Worldwide Web , 1996 .

[4]  Louisa Ha,et al.  An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media , 2008 .

[5]  Michael T. Elliott,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Advertising Clutter , 1997 .

[6]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[7]  R. Watson,et al.  THE WORLD WIDE WEB AS AN ADVERTISING MEDIUM , 1996 .

[8]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[9]  María Sicilia,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERACTIVITY IN A WEB SITE: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition , 2005 .

[10]  Guohua Wu.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Perceived Interactivity of Websites , 2006 .

[11]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[12]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[13]  Nikunj P. Dalal,et al.  Web home pages as advertisements , 1999, CACM.

[14]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[15]  Guohua Wu,et al.  The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website , 2005 .

[16]  Dongyoung Sohn,et al.  Network structures of commercial portal sites , 2005 .

[17]  Micael Dahlén,et al.  Informing and transforming on the web: an empirical study of response to banner ads for functional and expressive products , 2001 .

[18]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[19]  María Sicilia,et al.  The Role of Flow in Web Site Effectiveness , 2007 .

[20]  Hairong Li,et al.  Cognitive Impact of Banner Ad Characteristics: An Experimental Study , 1999 .

[21]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Webpage Background and Viewer Attitudes , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[22]  Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Interactivity in the electronic marketplace: An exposition of the concept and implications for research , 2005 .

[23]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences , 2000 .

[24]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  INTERACTIVITY AND ITS FACETS REVISITED , 2006 .

[25]  Gabriel J. Biehal,et al.  Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers' Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes , 1982 .

[26]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[27]  Pradeep K. Korgaonkar,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes and behaviour towards Web advertising , 2002 .

[28]  T. RatchfordB.  New insights about the FCB grid. , 1987 .

[29]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[30]  D. Stewart,et al.  Measuring the Effects and Effectiveness of Interactive Advertising , 2000 .

[31]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[32]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[33]  Kuen-Hee Ju-Pak,et al.  Content dimensions of Web advertising: a cross-national comparison , 1999 .

[34]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  INTERNET USES AND GRATIFICATIONS: A Structural Equation Model of Interactive Advertising , 2005 .

[35]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[36]  Mark Tremayne,et al.  Lessons Learned from Experiments with Interactivity on the Web , 2005 .

[37]  R. J. Kent,et al.  The Global Internet Shopper: Evidence from Shopping Tasks in Twelve Countries , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[38]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[39]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[40]  John A. Schibrowsky,et al.  Interactive integrated marketing communication: combining the power of IMC, the new media and database marketing , 2003 .

[41]  Dena S Cox,et al.  What Does Familiarity Breed? Complexity as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertisement Evaluation , 1988 .

[42]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Consumer Search: An Extended Framework , 1986 .