Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes

The objective of the study was to explore the effect of electrode encapsulation by fibrous scar tissue on electrical potential distributions and auditory nerve fibre excitation patterns. A finite element model in combination with an auditory nerve fibre model was used to predict changes in threshold currents and auditory nerve fibre excitation patterns. The model showed that electrical potentials at the target nerve fibres and the electrode contacts changed in the presence of encapsulation tissue. This led to changes in threshold currents and spread of excitation. The effect of electrode encapsulation on threshold currents and spread of excitation depended on the thickness of the perilymph layer separating the fibrous tissue encapsulation and the electrode array, nerve fibre survival status, electrode geometry and configuration, and array location. Model results suggested that arrays located close to the modiolus were most sensitive to threshold changes caused by electrode encapsulation (changes were between −0.26 and 2.41 dB), whereas encapsulation of an electrode array had less effect on threshold currents when the array was located in a lateral position in the scala tympani (changes were between −0.64 and 1.5 dB). For medially located arrays, changes in the spread of excitation varied between an increase of 0.21 mm and a decrease of 0.33 mm along the length of the basilar membrane, and an increase of 0.18 mm and a decrease of 0.66 mm along the length of the basilar membrane were calculated for laterally located arrays.

[1]  Elaine Saunders,et al.  Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array , 2001, Hearing Research.

[2]  H Engström,et al.  Normal structure of the organ of Corti and the effect of noise-induced cochlear damage. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[3]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1990, Hearing Research.

[4]  H. Schwan,et al.  Biological Engineering , 1970 .

[5]  B M Clopton,et al.  Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array. , 1997, Medical progress through technology.

[6]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Sensory Effects of Transient Electrical Stimulation - Evaluation with a Neuroelectric Model , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Harry J. Griffiths.  Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation , 1989 .

[8]  C. Fagnano,et al.  Raman spectroscopy in the study of biocompatibility. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[9]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[10]  Jeroen J. Briaire,et al.  Initial Evaluation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Neural Response Imaging , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[11]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[12]  H. Spoendlin,et al.  Analysis of the human auditory nerve , 1989, Hearing Research.

[13]  S. Lineaweaver,et al.  Potential field focusing and the design of cochlear electrode arrays , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  W. Kalender,et al.  Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[15]  J. Frijns,et al.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1996, Hearing Research.

[16]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Effects of time after deafening and implantation on guinea pig electrical detection thresholds , 2000, Hearing Research.

[17]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[18]  M F Dorman,et al.  Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  N M Young,et al.  Comparison of Pediatric Clarion Recipients With and Without the Electrode Positioner , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[20]  Adrien A Eshraghi,et al.  Modiolar Proximity of Three Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2002, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[21]  W. House,et al.  Cochlear implant histopathology. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[22]  G. Clark.  ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY NERVE: THE CODING OF FREQUENCY, THE PERCEPTION OF PITCH AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT SPEECH PROCESSING STRATEGIES FOR PROFOUNDLY DEAF PEOPLE , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[23]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[24]  H Plenk,et al.  Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery. , 2001, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[25]  G M Clark,et al.  The Contour Electrode Array: Safety Study and Initial Patient Trials of a New Perimodiolar Design , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[26]  G M Clark,et al.  The biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant. , 1988, The American journal of otology.

[27]  T Hanekom,et al.  Three-Dimensional Spiraling Finite Element Model of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlea , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[28]  J. Aran,et al.  Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea , 1997, Hearing Research.

[29]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[30]  G M Clark,et al.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[31]  W. Grill,et al.  Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  B M Clopton,et al.  Biophysical Measurements in the Implanted Cochlea , 1980, Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery.

[33]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Auditory Prostheses Research with Multiple Channel Intracochlear Stimulation in Man , 1978, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[34]  B J Gantz,et al.  Performance over time with a nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[35]  John K. Niparko,et al.  Evaluation of the Temporal Bones of a Multichannel Cochlear Implant Patient , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[36]  P J Abbas,et al.  Longitudinal Assessment of Physiological and Psychophysical Measures in Cochlear Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: Effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location , 1992, Hearing Research.

[38]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[39]  D. Kessler,et al.  The Clarion® Multi-Strategy™ Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[40]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Current Distribution Measurements Within the Human Cochlea , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  R. Cowan,et al.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking , 2003, Hearing Research.

[42]  G M Clark,et al.  Silastic with polyacrylic acid filler: swelling properties, biocompatibility and potential use in cochlear implants. , 1994, Biomaterials.