Copy, paste, and cloned notes in electronic health records: prevalence, benefits, risks, and best practice recommendations.

The modern medical record is not only used by providers to record nuances of patient care, but also is a document that must withstand the scrutiny of insurance payers and legal review. Medical documentation has evolved with the rapid growth in the use of electronic health records (EHRs). The medical software industry has created new tools and more efficient ways to document patient care encounters and record results of diagnostic testing. While these techniques have resulted in efficiencies and improvements in patient care and provider documentation, they have also created a host of new problems, including authorship attribution, data integrity, and regulatory concerns over the accuracy and medical necessity of billed services. Policies to guide provider documentation in EHRs have been developed by institutions and payers with the goal of reducing patient care risks as well as preventing fraud and abuse. In this article, we describe the major content-importing technologies that are commonly used in EHR documentation as well as the benefits and risks associated with their use. We have also reviewed a number of institutional policies and offer some best practice recommendations.

[1]  Mindy E. Flanagan,et al.  The next-generation electronic health record: perspectives of key leaders from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[2]  Michael D. Reis,et al.  Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  Paradoxical consequences and electronic notes. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[4]  J. Schold,et al.  Prevalence of Copied Information by Attendings and Residents in Critical Care Progress Notes* , 2013, Critical care medicine.

[5]  R. Hirschtick,et al.  A piece of my mind. John Lennon's elbow. , 2012, JAMA.

[6]  Peter Basch,et al.  Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems , 2011 .

[8]  David W Bates,et al.  Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Kaushal,et al.  Physicians’ Attitudes Towards Copy and Pasting in Electronic Note Writing , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  Dale W. Miller,et al.  Guidelines for EHR documentation to prevent fraud. , 2007, Journal of AHIMA.

[11]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  To err is not entirely human: Complex technology and user cognition , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[13]  J F Hurdle,et al.  Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors. , 2003, Methods of information in medicine.

[14]  Kenric W. Hammond,et al.  Are Electronic Medical Records Trustworthy? Observations on Copying, Pasting and Duplication , 2003, AMIA.

[15]  S. Goodrich,et al.  A Piece of My Mind , 2014 .