REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS

Abstract When performing vibration tests on civil engineering structures, it is often unpractical and expensive to use artificial excitation (shakers, drop weights). Ambient excitation on the contrary is freely available (traffic, wind), but it causes other challenges. The ambient input remains unknown and the system identification algorithms have to deal with output-only measurements. For instance, realisation algorithms can be used: originally formulated for impulse responses they were easily extended to output covariances. More recently, data-driven stochastic subspace algorithms which avoid the computation of the output covariances were developed. The key element of these algorithms is the projection of the row space of the future outputs into the row space of the past outputs. Also typical for ambient testing of large structures is that not all degrees of freedom can be measured at once but that they are divided into several set-ups with overlapping reference sensors. These reference sensors are needed to obtain global mode shapes. In this paper, a novel approach of stochastic subspace identification is presented that incorporates the idea of the reference sensors already in the identification step: the row space of future outputs is projected into the row space of past reference outputs. The algorithm is validated with real vibration data from a steel mast excited by wind load. The price paid for the important gain concerning computational efficiency in the new approach is that the prediction errors for the non-reference channels are higher. The estimates of the eigenfrequencies and damping ratios do not suffer from this fact.

[1]  A. Benveniste,et al.  STATE SPACE FORMULATION : A SOLUTION TO MODAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION , 1991 .

[2]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  In-operation damage monitoring and diagnostics of vibrating structures, with applications to offshore structures and rotating machinery , 1997 .

[3]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[4]  Β. L. HO,et al.  Editorial: Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output functions , 1966 .

[5]  T. Balendra Vibration of Buildings to Wind and Earthquake Loads , 1993 .

[6]  P. Van Overschee,et al.  Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem , 1991 .

[7]  Bart Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification: Uncertainty of the Estimated Modal Parameters , 1999 .

[8]  Maurice Goursat,et al.  In situ damage monitoring in vibration mechanics: diagnostics and predictive maintenance , 1993 .

[9]  J. Juang Applied system identification , 1994 .

[10]  Patrick Guillaume,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of modal parameters from operational data , 1999 .

[11]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem, , 1993, Autom..

[12]  A. Benveniste,et al.  Single sample modal identification of a nonstationary stochastic process , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Health monitoring and detection of a fatigue problem of a sports car , 1999 .

[14]  L. Hermans,et al.  MODAL TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES UNDER OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS: INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS , 1999 .

[15]  Bart Peeters,et al.  Stochastic subspace system identification of a steel transmitter mast , 1998 .

[16]  Andreas Johann Felber,et al.  Development of a hybrid bridge evaluation system , 1994 .

[17]  Maurice Goursat,et al.  Performance of output-only identification algorithms for modal analysis of aircraft structures , 1999 .

[18]  P. Caines Linear Stochastic Systems , 1988 .

[19]  Poul Henning Kirkegaard,et al.  State Space Identification of Civil Engineering Structures from Output Measurements , 1997 .

[20]  Thomas G. Carne,et al.  The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines , 1993 .

[21]  James Clary,et al.  Stochastic theory of minimal realization , 1976, 1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[22]  Maurice Goursat,et al.  On the application of a subspace-based fault detection method , 1999 .

[23]  R. Bertram,et al.  Stochastic Systems , 2008, Control Theory for Physicists.

[24]  Bart Peeters,et al.  Comparison of ambient and Forced Vibration Testing of civil engineering structures , 1999 .

[25]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[26]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Comparison of system identification methods using operational data of a bridge test , 1998 .