Is Fragmentation a Threat to the Success of the Internet of Things?

Internet of Things (IoT) aims to bring connectivity to almost every objects, i.e., things, found in the physical space. It extends connectivity to everyday things, however, such increase in the connectivity creates many prominent challenges. Context: Generally, IoT opens the door for new applications for machine-to-machine and human-to-human communications. The current trend of collaborating, distributed teams through the Internet, mobile communications, and autonomous entities, e.g., robots, is the first phase of the IoT to develop and deliver diverse services and applications. However, such collaborations is threatened by the fragmentation that we witness in the industry nowadays as it brings difficulty to integrate the diverse technologies of the various objects found in IoT systems. Diverse technologies induce interoperability issues while designing and developing various services and applications, hence, limiting the possibility of reusing the data, more specifically, the software (including frameworks, firmware, applications programming interfaces, and user interfaces) as well as of facing issues, like security threats and bugs, when developing new services or applications. Different aspects of handling data collection ranging from discovering smart sensors for data collection, integrating and applying reasoning on them must be available to provide interoperability and flexibility to the diverse objects interacting in the system. However, such approaches are bound to be challenged in future IoT scenarios as they bring substantial performance impairments in settings with the very large number of collaborating devices and technologies. Objective: We raise the awareness of the community about the lack of interoperability among technologies developed for IoT and challenges that their integration poses. We also provide guidelines for researchers and practitioners interested in connecting IoT networks and devices to develop services and applications. Method: We apply the methods advocated by the evidence-based software engineering paradigm. This paradigm and its core tool, the systematic literature review (SLR), were introduced to the software-engineering research community early 2004 to help researchers and industry systematically and objectively gather and aggregate evidences about different topics. In this paper, we conduct an SLR of both IoT interoperability issues and the state-of-practice of IoT technologies in the industry, highlighting the integration challenges related to the IoT that have significantly shifted the landscape of Internet-based collaborative services and applications nowadays. Results: Our SLR identifies a number of studies from journals, conferences, and workshops with the highest quality in the field. This SLR reports different trends, including frameworks and technologies, for the IoT for better comprehension of the paradigm and discusses the integration and interoperability challenges across the different layers of this technology while shedding light on the current IoT state-of-practice. It also discusses some future research directions for the community.

[1]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Applications integration in a hybrid cloud computing environment: modelling and platform , 2013, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Bernhard Walke,et al.  IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local Area Networks , 2006 .

[3]  Vangelis Gazis,et al.  A Survey of Standards for Machine-to-Machine and the Internet of Things , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Simen Kurtzhals Hammerseth Implementing RPL in a mobile and fixed wireless sensor network with OMNeT , 2011 .

[5]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Internet of Things , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[6]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A comparative performance study of the routing protocols LOAD and RPL with bi-directional traffic in low-power and lossy networks (LLN) , 2011, PE-WASUN '11.

[7]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Integrating wireless sensor networks with the grid , 2004, IEEE Internet Computing.

[8]  Ling Li,et al.  Effects of enterprise technology on supply chain collaboration: analysis of China-linked supply chain , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Lei Ren,et al.  A methodology towards virtualisation-based high performance simulation platform supporting multidisciplinary design of complex products , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Steven Swanson,et al.  Near-Data Processing: Insights from a MICRO-46 Workshop , 2014, IEEE Micro.

[11]  Yu Yang,et al.  Study and application on the architecture and key technologies for IOT , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology.

[12]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) , 2014, RFC.

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  The Internet of nano-things , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[14]  Shusen Yang,et al.  A survey on the ietf protocol suite for the internet of things: standards, challenges, and opportunities , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[15]  Xi Vincent Wang,et al.  DIMP: an interoperable solution for software integration and product data exchange , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[16]  David A. Maltz,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4 , 2007, RFC.

[17]  Wolfgang Weller,et al.  Auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution , 2014 .

[18]  Huansheng Ning,et al.  Future Internet of Things Architecture: Like Mankind Neural System or Social Organization Framework? , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[19]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[20]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[21]  K. Kuladinithi,et al.  Implementation of CoAP and its Application in Transport Logistics , 2011 .

[22]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews , 2015 .

[23]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[24]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Platforms for the Internet of Things : An Analysis of Existing Solutions , 2014 .

[25]  Nader Mohamed,et al.  Challenges in middleware solutions for the internet of things , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[26]  Jaeho Kim,et al.  M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[27]  Geoff Mulligan,et al.  The 6LoWPAN architecture , 2007, EmNets '07.

[28]  Dario Sabella,et al.  Mobile-Edge Computing Architecture: The role of MEC in the Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.

[29]  Martin J. Dürst,et al.  Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) , 2005, RFC.

[30]  Carles Gomez,et al.  Overview and Evaluation of Bluetooth Low Energy: An Emerging Low-Power Wireless Technology , 2012, Sensors.

[31]  Peter Friess,et al.  Internet of Things Strategic Research Roadmap , 2011 .

[32]  Mahmoud Elkhodr,et al.  The Internet of Things: New Interoperability, Management and Security Challenges , 2016, ArXiv.

[33]  François Carrez,et al.  Designing IoT architecture(s): A European perspective , 2014, 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[34]  Author Platforms for the Internet of Things – An Analysis of Existing Solutions , 2013 .

[35]  Pramod Anantharam,et al.  Semantic Gateway as a Service Architecture for IoT Interoperability , 2014, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Services.

[36]  Michael Weyrich,et al.  Reference Architectures for the Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Software.

[37]  Daniel Minoli,et al.  IoT Security (IoTSec) Mechanisms for e-Health and Ambient Assisted Living Applications , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE).

[38]  Lida Xu,et al.  IoT and Cloud Computing in Automation of Assembly Modeling Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[39]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[40]  Dmitry Namiot,et al.  On micro-services architecture , 2014 .

[41]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Systematisation of Interoperability Body of Knowledge: the foundation for Enterprise Interoperability as a science , 2013, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Antonio Iera,et al.  Smart things in the social loop: Paradigms, technologies, and potentials , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[43]  Niraj K. Jha,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Security of Internet-of-Things , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[44]  Dimitris Kiritsis,et al.  Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[45]  Maya Daneva,et al.  On the pragmatic design of literature studies in software engineering: an experience-based guideline , 2016, Empirical Software Engineering.

[46]  Gyanendra Prasad Joshi,et al.  Survey, Nomenclature and Comparison of Reader Anti-Collision Protocols in RFID , 2008 .

[47]  Rainer Drath,et al.  Industrie 4.0: Hit or Hype? [Industry Forum] , 2014, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[48]  Larisa Bulysheva,et al.  Enterprise systems in Russia: 1992–2012 , 2013, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Jose A. Gutierrez,et al.  Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks: Enabling Wireless Sensors with IEEE 802.15.4 , 2003 .

[50]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  A survey on IP‐based wireless sensor network solutions , 2010, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[51]  Klaus Moessner,et al.  Leveraging the Internet of Things: Integration of Sensors and Cloud Computing Systems , 2016, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[52]  Song Han,et al.  WirelessHART: Applying Wireless Technology in Real-Time Industrial Process Control , 2008, 2008 IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium.

[53]  JeongGil Ko,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of RPL and 6LoWPAN in TinyOS , 2011 .

[54]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[55]  David K. Chiabi European Telecommunications Standards Institute , 2015 .

[56]  Raja Lavanya,et al.  Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things , 2019, Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering.

[57]  Hongming Cai,et al.  An IoT-Oriented Data Storage Framework in Cloud Computing Platform , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[58]  Hiroaki Harai,et al.  Internet of things standardization in ITU and prospective networking technologies , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[59]  Leila Ben Saad,et al.  Simulation of the RPL Routing Protocol for IPv6 Sensor Networks: two cases studies , 2011 .

[60]  Peter Friess,et al.  Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems , 2013 .

[61]  Xiaojun Wang,et al.  Application of Environmental Internet of Things on water quality management of urban scenic river , 2013 .

[62]  Kris Steenhaut,et al.  Evaluation of constrained application protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN).

[63]  Chengen Wang Advances in information integration infrastructures supporting multidisciplinary design optimisation , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Juan E. Tapiador,et al.  M2AP: A Minimalist Mutual-Authentication Protocol for Low-Cost RFID Tags , 2006, UIC.

[65]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering , 2014, EASE '14.

[66]  Lida Xu,et al.  Integration of hybrid wireless networks in cloud services oriented enterprise information systems , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Shi-Wan Lin,et al.  Industrial Internet Reference Architecture , 2015 .

[68]  Katsuhiro Naito,et al.  A Survey on the Internet-of-Things: Standards, Challenges and Future Prospects , 2017, J. Inf. Process..

[69]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Social Internet of Things (SIoT) - When social networks meet the Internet of Things: Concept, architecture and network characterization , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[70]  Ricardo Simon Carbajo,et al.  Performance evaluation of the 6LoWPAN protocol on MICAz and TelosB motes , 2009, PM2HW2N '09.

[71]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Harvesting Wiki Consensus: Using Wikipedia Entries as Vocabulary for Knowledge Management , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[72]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A critical evaluation of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[73]  Joe Cecil,et al.  Information systems for enterprise integration, interoperability and networking: theory and applications , 2013, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[74]  Jihong Liu,et al.  An efficient and flexible web services-based multidisciplinary design optimisation framework for complex engineering systems , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Apostolos Malatras,et al.  Web Enabled Wireless Sensor Networks for Facilities Management , 2008, IEEE Systems Journal.

[76]  Yunlei Zhao,et al.  A New Framework for RFID Privacy , 2010, ESORICS.

[77]  K. M. Hou,et al.  RPL Routing Protocol a case study: Precision agriculture , 2012 .

[78]  Emmanuel Baccelli,et al.  The P2P-RPL routing protocol for IPv6 sensor networks: Testbed experiments , 2011, SoftCOM 2011, 19th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks.

[79]  Olivier Bonaventure,et al.  On link estimation in dense RPL deployments , 2012, 37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks - Workshops.

[80]  Stan Ratliff,et al.  Dynamic MANET On-demand (AODVv2) Routing , 2013 .

[81]  Fabrice Theoleyre,et al.  Multipath opportunistic RPL routing over IEEE 802.15.4 , 2011, MSWiM '11.

[82]  Cesare Pautasso,et al.  Why is the web loosely coupled?: a multi-faceted metric for service design , 2009, WWW '09.

[83]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  > Replace This Line with Your Paper Identification Number (double-click Here to Edit) < , 2022 .

[84]  Sarmad Ullah Khan,et al.  Future Internet: The Internet of Things Architecture, Possible Applications and Key Challenges , 2012, 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology.

[85]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  CoAP: An Application Protocol for Billions of Tiny Internet Nodes , 2012, IEEE Internet Computing.

[86]  Gennaro Boggia,et al.  Standardized Protocol Stack for the Internet of (Important) Things , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[87]  Fei Tao,et al.  CCIoT-CMfg: Cloud Computing and Internet of Things-Based Cloud Manufacturing Service System , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[88]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[89]  George C. Oikonomou,et al.  Stateless multicast forwarding with RPL in 6LowPAN sensor networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[90]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[91]  John D'Ambrosia,et al.  Evolution of ethernet standards in the IEEE 802.3 working group , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[92]  Erik Wilde,et al.  From the Internet of Things to the Web of Things: Resource-oriented Architecture and Best Practices , 2011, Architecting the Internet of Things.