Modeling EEG-based Motor Imagery with Session to Session Online Adaptation

Subject-specific calibration plays an important role in electroencephalography (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) for Motor Imagery (MI) detection. A calibration session is often introduced to build a subject specific model, which then can be deployed into BCI system for MI detection in the following rehabilitation sessions. The model is termed as a fixed calibration model. Progressive adaptive models can also be built by using data not only from calibration session, but also from available rehabilitation sessions. It was reported that the progressive adaptive model yielded significant improved MI detection compared to the fixed model in a retrospective clinical study. In this work, we deploy the progressive adaptation model in a BCI-based stroke rehabilitation system and bring it online. We dub this system nBETTER (Neurostyle Brain Exercise Therapy Towards Enhanced Recovery). A clinical trial using the nBETTER system was conducted to evaluate the performance of 11 stroke patients who underwent a calibration session followed by 18 rehabilitation sessions over 6 weeks. We conduct retrospective analysis to compare the performance of various modeling strategies: the fixed calibration model, the online progressive adaptation model and a light-weight adaptation model, where the second one is generated online by nBETTER system and the other two models are obtained retrospectively. The mean accuracy of the three models across 11 subjects are 68.17%, 74.04% and 74.53% respectively. Statistical test conducted on the three groups using ANOVA yields a p-value of 9.83-e06. The test result shows that the two adaptation models both have significant different mean from fixed mode. Hence our study confirmed the effectiveness of using the progressive adaptive model for EEGbased BCI to detect MI in an online setting.

[1]  Anne R. Isaac,et al.  Mental practice: Does it work in the field? , 1992 .

[2]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain–computer interfacing to mental state monitoring , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  D.J. McFarland,et al.  Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface (BCI): feature selection by regression improves performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Ensembles of adaptive spatial filters increase BCI performance: an online evaluation , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  John Q. Gan SELF-ADAPTING BCI BASED ON UNSUPERVISED LEARNING , 2006 .

[9]  K. Lafleur,et al.  Quadcopter control in three-dimensional space using a noninvasive motor imagery-based brain–computer interface , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[12]  G. Romani,et al.  Fundamentals of electroencefalography, magnetoencefalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, International review of neurobiology.

[13]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  EEG-Based Strategies to Detect Motor Imagery for Control and Rehabilitation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Tong Heng Lee,et al.  Dynamically weighted ensemble classification for non-stationary EEG processing , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.