Mortality following acute medical admission in Denmark: a feasibility study

Background As the population ages, an increasing number of acute medical patients will be older and have comorbidities that may interact with their primary admission condition and worsen their prognosis. Objectives To examine whether 6-month mortality following acute medical admission was associated with gender, age, or comorbidity. Methods We used the Danish National Patient Registry, covering all Danish hospitals, to identify all acute medical admissions to Aarhus University Hospital during 2008 and comorbidities. We obtained mortality data from the Danish Civil Registration System. We computed mortality risks and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for gender, age, and comorbidity groups. Results We identified 3,727 patients (53.6% women) with a median age of 63 years for women and 60 years for men. The overall 6-month mortality rate was 12.8%. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.77 (95% CI, 2.11–3.64) for patients aged 65–80 years and 5.25 (95% CI, 4.06–6.80) for patients older than 80 years, compared with patients younger than 65 years. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.43 (95% CI, 1.82–3.24) and 3.87 (95% CI, 2.91–5.15) for patients with moderate and high comorbidity, respectively, compared with low comorbidity. Conclusion Age and comorbidity were important predictors of mortality after acute medical admission.

[1]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  A Bouckaert,et al.  Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  K. White,et al.  Clinical epidemiology. , 1983, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  C. Hoffman,et al.  Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. , 1996, JAMA.

[5]  L. Bouter,et al.  How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  J. Hallas,et al.  Use of sumatriptan in Denmark in 1994-5: an epidemiological analysis of nationwide prescription data. , 1997, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[7]  S. Cummings,et al.  Use of bisphosphonates among women and risk of atrial fibrillation and flutter: population based case-control study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  J. Coresh,et al.  Adjusting survival curves for confounders: a review and a new method. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Guy M. Wilson,et al.  How to Measure , 2010 .

[11]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiologyA study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use. , 1997, The International journal of risk & safety in medicine.

[12]  L Frank,et al.  When an Entire Country Is a Cohort , 2000, Science.

[13]  H. Emons,et al.  What to measure? , 2012, Accreditation and Quality Assurance.

[14]  I. Vaartjes,et al.  Long-term survival after initial hospital admission for peripheral arterial disease in the lower extremities , 2009, BMC cardiovascular disorders.

[15]  V. Bezlyak,et al.  Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Christiansen,et al.  LABKA. A real-time computer system for the clinical laboratory. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[17]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[18]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.

[19]  P. Mortensen,et al.  The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. , 2006, Danish medical bulletin.