ARES: an anti-jamming reinforcement system for 802.11 networks

Dense, unmanaged 802.11 deployments tempt saboteurs into launching jamming attacks by injecting malicious interference. Nowadays, jammers can be portable devices that transmit intermittently at low power in order to conserve energy. In this paper, we first conduct extensive experiments on an indoor 802.11 network to assess the ability of two physical layer functions, rate adaptation and power control, in mitigating jamming. In the presence of a jammer we find that: (a) the use of popular rate adaptation algorithms can significantly degrade network performance and, (b) appropriate tuning of the carrier sensing threshold allows a transmitter to send packets even when being jammed and enables a receiver capture the desired signal. Based on our findings, we build ARES, an Anti-jamming REinforcement System, which tunes the parameters of rate adaptation and power control to improve the performance in the presence of jammers. ARES ensures that operations under benign conditions are unaffected. To demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of ARES, we evaluate it in three wireless testbeds: (a) an 802.11n WLAN with MIMO nodes, (b) an 802.11a/g mesh network with mobile jammers and (c) an 802.11a WLAN with TCP traffic. We observe that ARES improves the network throughput across all testbeds by up to 150%.

[1]  D. Woolley,et al.  The white paper , 1943, Public Health.

[2]  James C. Chen Measured Performance of 5-GHz 802.11a Wireless LAN Systems , 2001 .

[3]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  a high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[4]  Guevara Noubir,et al.  Low-power DoS attacks in data wireless LANs and countermeasures , 2003, MOCO.

[5]  M. Klepal,et al.  Wireless LAN Network Design: Site Survey or Propagation Modeling? , 2003 .

[6]  Guevara Noubir,et al.  On Connectivity in Ad Hoc Networks under Jamming Using Directional Antennas and Mobility , 2004, WWIC.

[7]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  Channel surfing and spatial retreats: defenses against wireless denial of service , 2004, WiSe '04.

[8]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  The feasibility of launching and detecting jamming attacks in wireless networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[9]  John C. Bicket,et al.  Bit-rate selection in wireless networks , 2005 .

[10]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Facilitating access point selection in IEEE 802.11 wireless networks , 2005, IMC '05.

[11]  Kalyan Basu,et al.  IEEE 802 . 11 Rate Control Algorithms : Experimentation and Performance Evaluation in Infrastructure Mode , 2005 .

[12]  Hamid Jafarkhani,et al.  Space-Time Coding - Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[13]  Guevara Noubir,et al.  On link layer denial of service in data wireless LANs , 2005, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[14]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  Jamming sensor networks: attack and defense strategies , 2006, IEEE Network.

[15]  Dan Rubenstein,et al.  Using Channel Hopping to Increase 802.11 Resilience to Jamming Attacks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[16]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  MDG: measurement-driven guidelines for 802.11 WLAN design , 2007, MobiCom '07.

[17]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  Interference Mitigation Through Power Control in High Density 802.11 WLANs , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[18]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Understanding and mitigating the impact of RF interference on 802.11 networks , 2007, SIGCOMM 2007.

[19]  Srikanth V. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Gaming the jammer: Is frequency hopping effective? , 2009, 2009 7th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks.