Artificial lateral line for aquatic habitat modelling: An example for Lefua echigonia

Abstract The lateral line system allows fish to sense the surrounding hydrodynamics via changes in the pressure, acceleration and velocity fields, providing additional information about physical habitat structure. Relations between fish and habitat preference have been traditionally inferred using the parameters of water depth, time-averaged velocity, substrate and vegetation to predict their abundance or presence. However, current methods rely on time-averaged point observations, ignoring the fluid-body interactions used by fish to sense the local flow environment. Here we present the first study to explore the use of artificial lateral lines as tools for aquatic habitat assessment. Relations are explored between conventional physical habitat variables in conjunction with measurements from a pressure sensor-based artificial lateral line probe (LLP). Comparisons are performed using field data of an endangered species, Lefua echigonia, in the Yagawa River (Japan). Random forest presence/absence models were created using habitat variables and the pressure-based LLP variables. Results show that the pressure-based variables were strongly correlated with the habitat variables, indicating that the LLP is able to capture the complex multivariate information encoded in the conventional variables with a single time-averaged measurement. In addition, presence/absence models of L. echigonia based on pressure-based variables marginally outperformed models based on the habitat variables. The major findings of this work are: i) LLP-based habitat models are capable of providing similar or better results than when using conventional habitat variables with considerably less field sampling effort, and ii) the probe-based method removes the subjective bias from observations and reduces model dimensionality. The results of this study indicate that fish habitat models can be efficiently and accurately carried out using a lateral line probe instead of traditional multivariate models based on the water depth, flow velocity, substrate and vegetation.

[1]  M. McHenry,et al.  The Biophysics of the Fish Lateral Line , 2013 .

[2]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion , 2008, Biology Letters.

[3]  M. J. Costa,et al.  Can vegetation provide shelter to cyprinid species under hydropeaking? , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  P. Goethals,et al.  The distribution of an invasive fish species is highly affected by the presence of native fish species: evidence based on species distribution modelling , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[5]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  Fish habitat preferences in large streams of southern France , 1999 .

[6]  Jean-Luc Baglinière,et al.  Spatial niche variability for young Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (S. trutta) in heterogeneous streams , 1999 .

[7]  Xue Ying,et al.  An Overview of Overfitting and its Solutions , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[8]  J. Engel,et al.  From artificial hair cell sensor to artificial lateral line system: Development and application , 2007, 2007 IEEE 20th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[9]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[10]  Daniel V. Oliveira,et al.  HABITAT USE BY NATIVE AND STOCKED TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA L.) IN TWO NORTHEAST STREAMS, PORTUGAL , 2006 .

[11]  Jane Elith,et al.  Error and uncertainty in habitat models , 2006 .

[12]  A. Pinheiro,et al.  Fish under pressure: Examining behavioural responses of Iberian barbel under simulated hydropeaking with instream structures , 2019, PloS one.

[13]  Paolo Vezza,et al.  Random forests to evaluate biotic interactions in fish distribution models , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Current velocity estimation using a lateral line probe , 2015 .

[15]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[16]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Underwater vehicle speedometry using differential pressure sensors: Preliminary results , 2016, 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV).

[17]  Martin Schletterer,et al.  Hydroacoustic and Pressure Turbulence Analysis for the Assessment of Fish Presence and Behavior Upstream of a Vertical Trash Rack at a Run-of-River Hydropower Plant , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[18]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  The senses of fish : adaptations for the reception of natural stimuli , 2004 .

[19]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[20]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R , 2017 .

[21]  Ke Chen,et al.  Estimation of Flow Turbulence Metrics With a Lateral Line Probe and Regression , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  M. Kruusmaa,et al.  Differential Pressure Sensors for Underwater Speedometry in Variable Velocity and Acceleration Conditions , 2018, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[23]  W. Junk The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[24]  J. Engel,et al.  Artificial Lateral Line And Hydrodynamic Object Tracking , 2006, 19th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[25]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[26]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[27]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[28]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Data prevalence matters when assessing species' responses using data-driven species distribution models , 2016, Ecol. Informatics.

[29]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) , 2006 .

[30]  S. Makrakis,et al.  Potamodromous brown trout movements in the North of the Iberian Peninsula: Modelling past, present and future based on continuous fishway monitoring. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS , 2005 .

[32]  Martyn C. Lucas,et al.  Migration of Freshwater Fishes , 2001 .

[33]  R. Muñoz‐Mas,et al.  Habitat evaluation for the endangered fish species Lefua echigonia in the Yagawa River, Japan , 2019, Journal of Ecohydraulics.

[34]  Satoshi Kameyama,et al.  Spatio-temporal changes in habitat potential of endangered freshwater fish in Japan , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[35]  Silke Janitza,et al.  On the overestimation of random forest’s out-of-bag error , 2018, PloS one.

[36]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Habitat prediction and knowledge extraction for spawning European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) using a broad range of species distribution models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[37]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[38]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory , 2008 .

[39]  Youki Fukasawa,et al.  Intraspecific Relationships and Variation of Two Lefua Species (Balitoridae, Cypriniformes) in the Tokai Region, Honshu, Japan , 2017 .

[40]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Underwater map-based localization using flow features , 2017, Auton. Robots.

[41]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  The Mechanosensory Lateral Line , 1989 .

[42]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Flow velocity estimation using a fish-shaped lateral line probe with product-moment correlation features and a neural network , 2017 .

[43]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Editorial: Ecosystem assessment and management , 2015, Ecol. Informatics.

[44]  S. Dijkgraaf THE FUNCTIONING and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LATERAL‐LINE ORGANS , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[45]  Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen,et al.  Flow feature extraction for underwater robot localization: Preliminary results , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[46]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[47]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  The Senses of Fish , 2004, Springer Netherlands.

[48]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Sensory Ecology and Neuroethology of the Lateral Line , 2013 .

[49]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Against the flow: A Braitenberg controller for a fish robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[50]  Jorge Cadima,et al.  Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[51]  Eve McDonald-Madden,et al.  Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions , 2013, Ecology letters.

[52]  Henrique N. Cabral,et al.  Distribution models of estuarine fish species: The effect of sampling bias, species ecology and threshold selection on models' accuracy , 2019, Ecol. Informatics.

[53]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[54]  Bernard Bobée,et al.  A review of statistical methods for the evaluation of aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment , 2006 .

[55]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Determination of object position, vortex shedding frequency and flow velocity using artificial lateral line canals , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[56]  C. Wolter,et al.  Where Are All the Fish: Potential of Biogeographical Maps to Project Current and Future Distribution Patterns of Freshwater Species , 2012, PloS one.

[57]  Richard Schwarzenberger,et al.  Man-made flows from a fish’s perspective: autonomous classification of turbulent fishway flows with field data collected using an artificial lateral line , 2018, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[58]  Ans Mouton,et al.  Ecological relevance of' performance criteria for species distribution models , 2010 .

[59]  Morphological Characteristics of Lateral Line in Three Species of Fish , 2010 .

[60]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling , 2010 .

[61]  N. Takamura,et al.  A laboratory study of the effects of shelter availability and invasive crayfish on the growth of native stream fish , 2012 .

[62]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[63]  M. T. Ferreira,et al.  Spatial preferences of Iberian barbel in a vertical slot fishway under variable hydrodynamic scenarios , 2018, Ecological Engineering.

[64]  S. Coombs,et al.  Information Encoding and Processing by the Peripheral Lateral Line System , 2013 .

[65]  David L. Smith,et al.  Relating Turbulence and Fish Habitat: A New Approach for Management and Research , 2014 .