Modeling Symmetric Macromolecular Structures in Rosetta3

Symmetric protein assemblies play important roles in many biochemical processes. However, the large size of such systems is challenging for traditional structure modeling methods. This paper describes the implementation of a general framework for modeling arbitrary symmetric systems in Rosetta3. We describe the various types of symmetries relevant to the study of protein structure that may be modeled using Rosetta's symmetric framework. We then describe how this symmetric framework is efficiently implemented within Rosetta, which restricts the conformational search space by sampling only symmetric degrees of freedom, and explicitly simulates only a subset of the interacting monomers. Finally, we describe structure prediction and design applications that utilize the Rosetta3 symmetric modeling capabilities, and provide a guide to running simulations on symmetric systems.

[1]  K Fidelis,et al.  A large‐scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods , 1995, Proteins.

[2]  David Baker,et al.  Improved beta‐protein structure prediction by multilevel optimization of nonlocal strand pairings and local backbone conformation , 2006, Proteins.

[3]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[4]  D. Baker,et al.  Simultaneous prediction of protein folding and docking at high resolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  W. Braun,et al.  Rapid calculation of first and second derivatives of conformational energy with respect to dihedral angles for proteins general recurrent equations , 1984, Comput. Chem..

[6]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Determination of the Structures of Symmetric Protein Oligomers from NMR Chemical Shifts and Residual Dipolar Couplings , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Niles A Pierce,et al.  Protein design is NP-hard. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[10]  David Baker,et al.  Prediction of the structure of symmetrical protein assemblies , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Rotamer-Pair Energy Calculations Using a Trie Data Structure , 2005, WABI.

[12]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.