Performance evaluation of Indian Railway zones using DEMATEL and VIKOR methods

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose the application of a decision-making tool for performance evaluation of Indian Railway zones. It basically seeks to analyze the effects of various evaluation criteria on the performance of Indian Railways using a combined multi-criteria decision-making approach which employs decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and “VIse Kriterijumska Optimizacija kompromisno Resenje” (VIKOR) methods. Design/methodology/approach – The performance of 16 Indian Railway zones is first evaluated using DEMATEL method which addresses the inter-relationships between different criteria with the aid of a relationship structure. The VIKOR method which is a compromise ranking approach is then adopted to rank those candidate railway zones. Pareto analysis is also carried out to identify the benchmark railway zones for the under/poor performers so as to improve their operational excellence. Findings – A numerical example from Indian Railways is illustrated and solv...

[1]  Agha Iqbal Ali,et al.  Comparative advantage and disadvantage in DEA , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions: With application to European railways , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[5]  Wessel Pienaar,et al.  Rail benchmarking – new paradigms: a South African position , 2013 .

[6]  Naser Hamidi,et al.  A hybrid of Borda and DEMTEL for productivity improvement , 2012 .

[7]  H. Tamura,et al.  Structural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society , 2005 .

[8]  Abdellah El Moudni,et al.  A hybrid Petri nets-based simulation model for evaluating the design of railway transit stations , 2007, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[9]  Deba Prasad Rath,et al.  A User’s Perspective on the Database of Services Sector in Indian Economy , 2006 .

[10]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization , 2008, Appl. Math. Comput..

[12]  Harwinder Singh,et al.  Benchmarking the performance indicators of Indian Railway container business using data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[13]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model , 2008 .

[14]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  Data Based Framework to Identify the Most Significant Performance Shaping Factors in Railway Operations , 2015 .

[15]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Assessing the technical efficiency, service effectiveness, and technical effectiveness of the world's railways through NDEA analysis , 2008 .

[16]  Sajeev Abraham George,et al.  A performance benchmarking study of Indian Railway zones , 2008 .

[17]  Y P Singh PERFORMANCE OF THE KOLKATA (CALCUTTA) METRO RAILWAY: A CASE STUDY , 2002 .

[18]  Antonio Laurino,et al.  The economic regulation of railway networks: A worldwide survey , 2015 .

[19]  Akihiro Nakamura,et al.  Causes of inefficiency in Japanese railways: Application of DEA for managers and policymakers , 2010 .

[20]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Pierre Pestieau,et al.  Decomposing efficiency into its managerial and its regulatory components: The case of European railways , 1995 .

[23]  Nadia Tahir Efficiency Analysis of Pakistan Railway in Comparison with China and India , 2013 .

[24]  A. Gabus,et al.  Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility , 1973 .