Modelling the comet assay

The single-cell gel electrophoresis technique or comet assay is widely regarded as a quick and reliable method of analysing DNA damage in individual cells. It has a proven track record from the fields of biomonitoring to nutritional studies. The assay operates by subjecting cells that are fixed in agarose to high salt and detergent lysis, thus removing all the cellular content except the DNA. By relaxing the DNA in an alkaline buffer, strands containing breaks are released from supercoiling. Upon electrophoresis, these strands are pulled out into the agarose, forming a tail which, when stained with a fluorescent dye, can be analysed by fluorescence microscopy. The intensity of this tail reflects the amount of DNA damage sustained. Despite being such an established and widely used assay, there are still many aspects of the comet assay which are not fully understood. The present review looks at how the comet assay is being used, and highlights some of its limitations. The protocol itself varies among laboratories, so results from similar studies may vary. Given such discrepancies, it would be attractive to break the assay into components to generate a mathematical model to investigate specific parameters. The technique The single-cell gel electrophoresis assay has been used for over 20 years to assess DNA damage. The assay is able to measure both singleand double-strand breaks with versatility and sensitivity [1]. It has been used successfully over the years in key areas from human nutrition to biomonitoring [2,3]. In a typical assay, cells are fixed in agarose on a frosted slide and lysed to remove cellular proteins, leaving a cavity containing DNA with sufficient salt (2.5 M NaCl) and detergent to disrupt and remove membranes, histones and soluble cell constituents [3]. The DNA is then left to unwind in a buffer solution before being electrophoresed to pull the negatively charged, extended and relaxed loops containing strand breaks out of the cavity, forming the tail [4]. Intact DNA remains in the head and supercoiled. Comets are visualized using an intercalating dye such as ethidium bromide or DAPI (4′,6-diamidino2-phenylindole), which binds in the minor groove, and is normally analysed using comet-specific software [1]. The comet technique has been adapted over the years into different protocols such as the alkaline and neutral versions which were thought to discriminate between doubleand single-strand breaks. This theory was revealed by Collins et al. [1] at the most recent International Comet Assay conference to be a misconception as alkaline conditions are not specific to detecting single-strand breaks. FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) techniques were also adapted for application to the comet where the DNA probe can be hybridized to a specific gene sequence or even to a whole chromosome [5,6]. Comet-FISH has been used to

[1]  S. Taube,et al.  Cancer Diagnostics , 2005, American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice.

[2]  Peter Møller,et al.  The alkaline comet assay: towards validation in biomonitoring of DNA damaging exposures. , 2006, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[3]  J. D. du Plessis,et al.  DNA damage and repair detected by the comet assay in lymphocytes of african petrol attendants: a pilot study. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  H. McNulty,et al.  Detection of replicative integrity in small colonic biopsies using the BrdUrd comet assay , 2003, British journal of cancer.

[5]  H. McNulty,et al.  Global DNA and p53 region-specific hypomethylation in human colonic cells is induced by folate depletion and reversed by folate supplementation. , 2006, The Journal of nutrition.

[6]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA in mononuclear blood cells by the comet assay with visual scoring. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[7]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[8]  P. Olive,et al.  Heterogeneity in DNA damage using the comet assay , 2005, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[9]  A. Collins,et al.  The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[10]  P. Cook,et al.  Spectrofluorometric measurement of the binding of ethidium to superhelical DNA from cell nuclei. , 1978, European journal of biochemistry.

[11]  G. Wasson,et al.  The use of the comet assay in the study of human nutrition and cancer. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[12]  N. Rajab,et al.  Emerging applications of the single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay. I. Management of invasive transitional cell human bladder carcinoma. II. Fluorescent in situ hybridization Comets for the identification of damaged and repaired DNA sequences in individual cells. , 1998, Mutagenesis.

[13]  J. Mellon,et al.  Measurements using the alkaline comet assay predict bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  M. Green,et al.  The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): a European review. , 1993, Mutation research.

[16]  S. McKeown,et al.  Potential use of the comet assay in the clinical management of cancer. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[17]  K J Johanson,et al.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. , 1984, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  D. McArt,et al.  Systematic random sampling of the comet assay. , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[19]  Gunnar Brunborg,et al.  The comet assay: topical issues. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[20]  A. Collins,et al.  DNA damage and repair measured in different genomic regions using the comet assay with fluorescent in situ hybridization. , 2004, Mutagenesis.

[21]  A. Collins,et al.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair , 2004, Molecular biotechnology.

[22]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  DNA staining with the fluorochromes EtBr, DAPI and YOYO-1 in the comet assay with tobacco plants after treatment with ethyl methanesulphonate, hyperthermia and DNase-I. , 2006, Mutation research.

[23]  R. Tice,et al.  The single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay: a potential tool for detecting radiation-induced DNA damage in humans. , 1995, Stem cells.

[24]  D. Jackson,et al.  The size of chromatin loops in HeLa cells. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Takashi Omori,et al.  Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[26]  A. Rapp,et al.  UV-A breakage sensitivity of human chromosomes as measured by COMET-FISH depends on gene density and not on the chromosome size. , 2000, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[27]  A. Collins,et al.  Measuring oxidative damage to DNA; HPLC and the comet assay compared. , 1998, Free radical research.

[28]  J. Száková,et al.  Cadmium induces DNA damage in tobacco roots, but no DNA damage, somatic mutations or homologous recombination in tobacco leaves. , 2004, Mutation research.

[29]  G. McKerr,et al.  Use of the Comet-FISH Assay to Demonstrate Repair of the TP53 Gene Region in Two Human Bladder Carcinoma Cell Lines , 2003, Radiation research.

[30]  A. Collins,et al.  Comet assay-based methods for measuring DNA repair in vitro; estimates of inter- and intra-individual variation , 2009, Cell Biology and Toxicology.

[31]  D. Oliver,et al.  Studies on cellular resilience and adaptation following acute and repetitive exposure to ozone in cultured human epithelial (HeLa) cells , 2008, Redox report : communications in free radical research.

[32]  A. Khan,et al.  Some limitations of the comet assay to detect the treatment of seeds with ionising radiation , 2003 .

[33]  P. Olive,et al.  The comet assay: a comprehensive review. , 1995, Mutation research.

[34]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Application of the comet assay to measure DNA damage induced by UV radiation in the hydrophyte, Spirodela polyrhiza , 2007 .

[35]  M. Hausmann,et al.  The Comet-FISH Technique , 2005 .

[36]  A. Collins,et al.  DNA damage in diabetes: correlation with a clinical marker. , 1998, Free radical biology & medicine.

[37]  D. Lovell,et al.  Issues related to the experimental design and subsequent statistical analysis of in vivo and in vitro comet studies. , 1999, Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis.