What Determines the Value of Corporate Votes

This paper studies the determinants of the value of voting rights in U. S. corporations. Results support the hypothesis that the price of a vote is determined by the expected additional payment vote holders will receive for their votes in case of a control contest. The size of this differential payment is a function of the probability that a vote is pivotal in a control contest and the magnitude of the private benefits obtainable by controlling the company. Simple proxies for these two factors explain up to 30 percent of the variation of the voting premium across companies and through time. My findings also suggest that the value of managerial perquisites are, at least partially, reflected in the price of votes.

[1]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The free-rider problem and the theory of the corporation , 1980 .

[2]  Clifford G. Holderness,et al.  Private benefits from control of public corporations , 1989 .

[3]  R. Romano The Shareholder Suit: Litigation without Foundation? , 1991 .

[4]  Luigi Zingales The Value of the Voting Right: A Study of the Milan Stock Exchange Experience , 1994 .

[5]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Predicting takeover targets: A methodological and empirical analysis , 1986 .

[6]  Oliver Hart,et al.  One Share/One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control , 1987 .

[7]  John J. McConnell,et al.  The Market Value of Differential Voting Rights in Closely Held Corporations , 1984 .

[8]  John J. McConnell,et al.  The market value of control in publicly-traded corporations , 1983 .

[9]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  Values of Large Games II: Oceanic Games , 1978, Math. Oper. Res..

[10]  M. Horner The value of the corporate voting right: Evidence from Switzerland , 1988 .

[11]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Large Shareholders and Corporate Control , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  M. Harris,et al.  Corporate governance: Voting rights and majority rules , 1988 .

[13]  Harry DeAngelo,et al.  Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock☆ , 1985 .

[14]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Restricted Voting Stock, Acquisition Premiums, and the Market Value of Corporate Control , 1990 .

[15]  Jeffry M. Netter,et al.  Triggering the 1987 stock market crash : Antitakeover provisions in the proposed house ways and means tax bill? , 1989 .