Similarities Among the Shapes of Writing and Their Effects on Learning.

Writing systems are usually studied in terms of the level of language that they represent, with little attention to the shapes that are used to do so. Those shapes are not random or accidental, however. They tend to be similar to one another within a script. Many of the Latin letters have a roughly vertical stem or hasta with an appendage or coda to the right. This arrangement is more common than one with the coda on the left of the hasta. We present data to show that young children are generally better at copying and writing from memory shapes such as and , which have the typical arrangement with the coda on the right, than those such as and , which do not. The results suggest that children start to learn about the statistics of the letter shapes before they know how or that these shapes represent language.

[1]  D C Rubin,et al.  A schema for common cents , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[2]  J. Goodnow,et al.  “The grammar of action”: Sequence and syntax in children's copying☆ , 1973 .

[3]  E. B. Coleman.  Collecting a Data Base for a Reading Technology. Final Report. , 1970 .

[4]  Kristen D. Ritchey.  The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words , 2008 .

[5]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Spelling as Statistical Learning: Using Consonantal Context to Spell Vowels , 2006 .

[6]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Which manuscript letters do primary grade children write legibly , 2001 .

[7]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The case of case: Children's knowledge and use of upper- and lowercase letters , 2004, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[8]  R. Treiman,et al.  Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary: Evidence from US and Brazilian preschoolers , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[9]  Marvin L. Simner,et al.  The grammar of action and reversal errors in children's printing. , 1984 .

[10]  Nicole J. Conrad,et al.  A statistical learning perspective on children's learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. , 2008 .

[11]  J. Saffran.  What Is Statistical Learning, and What Statistical Learning Is Not , 2009 .

[12]  P. Worden,et al.  Young Children's Acquisition of Alphabet Knowledge , 1990 .

[13]  H. Lewis,et al.  An Analysis of Errors in the Formation of Manuscript Letters by First-Grade Children , 1965 .

[14]  N. Kaufman.  Review of Research on Reversal Errors , 1980, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Beatrice Primus.  A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet , 2004 .

[16]  C. Aubrey,et al.  The number knowledge of four to five year olds at school entry and at the end of their first year , 1997 .

[17]  Michael N Jones,et al.  Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[18]  Why do children reverse letters? , 1971, British journal of psychology.