Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies

Using panel data, we estimate measures of density, scale and scope economies in four countries that differ substantially in their levels of economic development and in their piped water and sewerage coverage: Brazil, Moldova, Romania and Vietnam. We find evidence of economies of scale in Moldova, Romania and Vietnam. In Brazil, we cannot reject the null hypothesis of constant returns to scale. The results of this study show that the cost structure of water and sewerage utilities varies significantly within and between countries and over time.

[1]  Alban Thomas,et al.  The Structure of Municipal Water Supply Costs: Application to a Panel of French Local Communities , 2001 .

[2]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ , 1984 .

[3]  John Cubbin,et al.  Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry , 1998 .

[4]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities) , 1989 .

[5]  John Hicks,et al.  The Theory of Wages , 1933 .

[6]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Costs and Structure of Technology in the Italian Water Industry , 2000 .

[7]  David Saal.  Investigation into evidence for economies of scale in the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: final report , 2004 .

[8]  N. Mocan,et al.  Quality Adjusted Cost Functions for Child Care Centers , 1995 .

[9]  Rangesan Narayanan,et al.  Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities , 1995 .

[10]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Infrastructure Performance and Reform in Developing and Transition Economies: Evidence from a Survey of Productivity Measures , 2005 .

[11]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[12]  David Parker,et al.  The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model , 2000 .

[13]  A. Buse,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1972 .

[14]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[15]  David Parker,et al.  Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry:a lesson in the implications of inappropriately assuming a common frontier , 2006 .

[16]  H Youn Kim.  Economies of Scale in Multi-product Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1987 .

[17]  Lester C. Hunt,et al.  Privatisation and Efficiency in the UK Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis , 2009 .

[18]  Takuya Urakami,et al.  Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations , 2001 .

[19]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[20]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74 , 1981 .

[21]  A. Zellner.  An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[22]  R. Shephard.  Cost and production functions , 1953 .

[23]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  Performance Measurement And Regulation of Network Utilities , 2007 .

[24]  John C. Panzar,et al.  Economies of Scale in Multi-Output Production , 1977 .

[25]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study , 2004 .

[26]  Euijune Kim,et al.  SPATIAL INTEGRATION OF URBAN WATER SERVICES AND ECONOMIES OF SCALE , 1998 .

[27]  P. Joskow.  Regulation of Natural Monopolies , 2005 .

[28]  Ronaldo Seroa da Motta,et al.  Efficiency and Regulation in the Sanitation Sector in Brazil , 2004 .