Low cost underwater gliders for littoral marine research

Current off-the-shelf underwater gliders (UGs) are large, heavy, expensive, and difficult to modify, both in hardware and software, which limits their use for multivehicle coordination experiments and deployment in high risk environments. To address these challenges, the Nonlinear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NAS Lab) at Michigan Tech has designed two types of UGs for concept development, testing, and problem solving, and additionally, for scaffolding advanced interest and education in engineering. The first, a Glider for Underwater Presentation and Promoting Interest in Engineering (GUPPIE), nationally targets high school students and undergraduates to provide these students a UG platform for hands-on experience in concept development, testing, and problem solving. The second platform is a Glider for Autonomous Littoral Underwater Research (GALUR). At 10% of the cost of current models, the GALUR was designed to serve as a low cost multivehicle control testbed for disparate research groups who need to test and validate control algorithms. Still a highly-maneuverable UG, the GALUR allows researchers to address underwater communication issues by implementing control strategies for individual and multiple vehicle underwater data collection and mapping. Through the process of developing and testing these two UGs, the research team is ultimately working toward their long term goal of developing a fleet of low cost highly maneuverable underwater gliders. This paper details the challenges and milestones of the development process, and outlines the future research trajectory and goals.

[1]  Ulrich Kremer,et al.  Towards a Resource-Aware Programming Architecture for Smart Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2008 .

[2]  Nina Mahmoudian,et al.  Developing an underwater glider for educational purposes , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  R. Davis,et al.  The autonomous underwater glider "Spray" , 2001 .

[4]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Stabilization and coordination of underwater gliders , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[5]  T.J. Osse,et al.  The Deepglider: A Full Ocean Depth Glider for Oceanographic Research , 2007, OCEANS 2007.

[6]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Cooperative Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  N. Mahmoudian,et al.  Approximate Analytical Turning Conditions for Underwater Gliders: Implications for Motion Control and Path Planning , 2010, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[8]  Benoit Clement,et al.  Sea glider guidance around a circle using distance measurements to a drifting acoustic source , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Craig M. Lee,et al.  Gliders as a Component of Future Observing Systems , 2010 .

[10]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Coordinated control of an underwater glider fleet in an adaptive ocean sampling field experiment in Monterey Bay , 2010, J. Field Robotics.

[11]  D. C. Webb,et al.  SLOCUM: an underwater glider propelled by environmental energy , 2001 .

[12]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Model-based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders , 2001 .

[13]  Nina Mahmoudian,et al.  Efficient Motion Planning and Control for Underwater Gliders , 2009 .

[14]  Nuno A. Cruz,et al.  TriMARES - A hybrid AUV/ROV for dam inspection , 2011, OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA.

[15]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Cooperative Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  W. John Gould,et al.  From Swallow floats to Argo—the development of neutrally buoyant floats , 2005 .

[17]  C. C. Eriksen,et al.  Seaglider: a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research , 2001 .

[18]  Shuangshuang Fan,et al.  Stability and performance of underwater gliders , 2012, 2012 Oceans.

[19]  David M. Fratantoni,et al.  Underwater Glider Model Parameter IdentiÞcation , 2003 .