Spatial Distribution of Sensible and Latent Heat Flux in the City of Basel (Switzerland)

Urban surfaces are a complex mixture of different land covers and surface materials; the relative magnitudes of the surface energy balance components therefore vary widely across a city. Eddy covariance (EC) measurements provide the best estimates of turbulent heat fluxes but are restricted to the source area. Land surface modeling with earth observation (EO) data is beneficial for extrapolation of a larger area since citywide information is possible. Turbulent sensible and latent heat fluxes are calculated by a combination of micrometeorological approaches (the aerodynamic resistance method, ARM), EO data, and GIS techniques. Input data such as land cover fractions and surface temperatures are derived from Landsat 8 OLI and TIRS, urban morphology was calculated from high-resolution digital building models and GIS data layers, and meteorological data were provided by flux tower measurements. Twenty-two Landsat scenes covering all seasons and different meteorological conditions were analyzed. Sensible heat fluxes were highest for industrial areas, railway stations, and areas with high building density, mainly corresponding to the pixels with highest surface-to-air temperature differences. The spatial distribution of latent heat flux is strongly related to the saturation deficit of vapor and the (minimum) stomatal resistance of vegetation types. Seasonal variations are highly dependent on meteorological conditions, i.e., air temperature, water vapor saturation deficit, and wind speed. Comparison of measured fluxes with modeled fluxes in the weighted source area of the flux towers is moderately accurate due to known drawbacks in the modeling approach and uncertainties inherent to EC measurements, particularly in urban areas.

[1]  William E. Reifsnyder,et al.  Radiation geometry in the measurement and interpretation of radiation balance , 1967 .

[2]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Urban Climates by T. R. Oke , 2017 .

[3]  Jiemin Wang,et al.  Assessment of Uncertainties in Eddy Covariance Flux Measurement Based on Intensive Flux Matrix of HiWATER-MUSOEXE , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  Eberhard Parlow,et al.  Determination of the aerodynamic resistance to heat using morphometric methods , 2010 .

[5]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  An operational remote sensing algorithm of land surface evaporation , 2003 .

[6]  W. Brutsaert.  Evaporation into the atmosphere , 1982 .

[7]  Thomas Esch,et al.  ANthropogenic heat FLUX estimation from Space , 2017, 2017 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE).

[8]  Dongwei Liu,et al.  Urban Multi-scale Environmental Predictor (UMEP): An integrated tool for city-based climate services , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Y. Yamaguchi,et al.  Estimation of storage heat flux in an urban area using ASTER data , 2007 .

[10]  Christian Feigenwinter,et al.  Eddy Covariance Measurements Over Urban Areas , 2012 .

[11]  T. Foken.  50 Years of the Monin–Obukhov Similarity Theory , 2006 .

[12]  James A. Voogt,et al.  Modeling Surface Sensible Heat Flux Using Surface Radiative Temperatures in a Simple Urban Area , 2000 .

[13]  M. Vetterli,et al.  Estimation of urban sensible heat flux using a dense wireless network of observations , 2009 .

[14]  U. Högström.  Non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the atmospheric surface layer: A re-evaluation , 1988 .

[15]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[16]  Tiina Markkanen,et al.  Footprint Evaluation for Flux and Concentration Measurements for an Urban-Like Canopy with Coupled Lagrangian Stochastic and Large-Eddy Simulation Models , 2015, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[17]  Helen A. Cleugh,et al.  A Simple Method to Determine Obukhov Lengths for Suburban Areas , 1994 .

[18]  R. Kormann,et al.  An Analytical Footprint Model For Non-Neutral Stratification , 2001 .