How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?

It has been claimed that a genuinely abstract numerical representation would be capable of representing the numerosity of any set of discrete elements independently of the attributes of the individual elements. In practice, however, perceptual variables, such as element size, density, and others, affect numerosity judgment. In this study, we examined how perceptual variables affect the performance of numerosity judgments under the control of factors such as amount of practice and set size. In Experiment 1, we introduced the numerosity comparison task to less experienced observers in order to examine the effect of element size and array area. In Experiment 2, we examined whether and how practice would influence precision and accuracy in numerosity comparison and demonstrated that the effects of perceptual variables mostly disappeared. In Experiment 3, we examined whether the effect of practice could transfer to the performance in different stimulus conditions. Taking the results together, we demonstrate that differences in practice might be the source of inconsistent results for perceptual variables.

[1]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement ☆ , 1981 .

[2]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  J. Allik,et al.  Size invariance in visual number discrimination , 1991, Psychological research.

[4]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[5]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[6]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants. , 2009, Developmental science.

[7]  L E Krueger,et al.  Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  E. Brannon,et al.  The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: using number is just easier. , 2008, Child development.

[10]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The representation of numerical magnitude , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[12]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived Numerosity as a Function of Item Size , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  J. Ross.  Visual Discrimination of Number without Counting , 2003, Perception.

[17]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  J. Simmons,et al.  Perceived numerosity as a function of array number, speed of array development, and density of array items , 1991 .

[20]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[22]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots , 1983, Vision Research.

[23]  E. Spelke,et al.  and element size bias numerosity perception , 2010 .

[24]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[25]  T. Tuulmets,et al.  Occupancy model of perceived numerosity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[27]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[28]  Norman Ginsburg.  Numerosity Estimation as a Function of Stimulus Organization , 1991, Perception.

[29]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[30]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[31]  Tony J. Simon,et al.  Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Jüri Allik,et al.  Interactions between area and numerosity , 1988, Psychological research.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[35]  Lester E. Krueger,et al.  Perceived numerosity , 1972 .

[36]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[37]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  How do people apprehend large numerosities? , 2008, Cognition.

[38]  H. Barth,et al.  Judgments of discrete and continuous quantity: An illusory Stroop effect , 2008, Cognition.

[39]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A Labeled-Line Code for Small and Large Numerosities in the Monkey Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.