Why are We Here? The Educational Value Model (EVM) as a Framework to Investigate the Role of Students’ Professional Identity Development

Education can be seen as a preparation for a future profession, where some educational programs very clearly prepare their students for a certain profession, e.g. plumber, nurse and architect. The possible professions for students following education programs in computing is quite varied and thus difficult to cater for, but to educate towards a professional life is still a stated goal in most higher education settings. We argue that this goal is typically not even closely reached and provide an analysis indicating factors explaining this situation. The analysis is based on the concept of professional identity.In earlier work [1] a framework with which to reason about student interactions with the regulatory structure of higher education and teachers was developed. In that paper we developed a compound model which not only relates these players to one another, but also provides approaches to reasoning about misalignments which arise when students and teachers approach their shared learning context from different perspectives. This framework is in this paper applied to address different aspects of professional identity with the intent of bringing forth deeper insights into challenges with educating towards professions. This issue is highly complex and the framework provides a structure that is beneficial for analysing different aspects in a more holistic manner.

[1]  Line Holth,et al.  Passionate men and rational women: gender contradictions in engineering , 2014 .

[2]  Kathryn F. Cochran,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation , 1993 .

[3]  Line Holth Den raka och den krokiga vägen till ingenjörsyrket : Om rationella kvinnor och passionerade män , 2012 .

[4]  Yvonne Steinert,et al.  Amending Miller’s Pyramid to Include Professional Identity Formation , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for.. , 1999 .

[6]  J. Bowden Capabilities-driven curriculum design , 2004 .

[7]  Paul M. Leidig,et al.  Resources for instructors of capstone courses in computing , 2001, ITiCSE-WGR '01.

[8]  Matthew Lee Smith,et al.  Forming and Developing Your Professional Identity , 2014, Health promotion practice.

[9]  William Heard Kilpatrick,et al.  The Project Method , 1918, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[10]  F. Korthagen In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education , 2004 .

[11]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies , 2018 .

[12]  Anne-Kathrin Peters,et al.  Learning Computing at University: Participation and Identity : A Longitudinal Study , 2017 .

[13]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda The Activity of Meaning Making: A Holistic Perspective on College Student Development , 2009 .

[14]  James Trevelyan,et al.  The Making of an Expert Engineer , 2014 .

[15]  Gerald C. Gannod,et al.  Dimensions for Categorizing Capstone Projects , 2009, 2009 22nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training.

[16]  Arnold Pears,et al.  Why are we here? Student perspectives on the goal of STEM higher education , 2017, 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[17]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[18]  Wendy Faulkner,et al.  Nuts and Bolts and People : Gender-troubled Engineering Identities , 2007 .

[19]  James E. Tomayko,et al.  Forging a discipline: An outline history of software engineering education , 1999, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[21]  Aletta Nylén,et al.  Open-ended projects opened up — aspects of openness , 2017, 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[22]  L. Shulman Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 2013 .

[23]  Arnold Pears,et al.  Engagement in Computer Science and IT -- What! A Matter of Identity? , 2013, 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering.

[24]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[25]  Aletta Nylén,et al.  How students get going: triggers for students' learning in project-based education , 2018, ITiCSE.

[26]  M. Knoll,et al.  “I Had Made a Mistake”: William H. Kilpatrick and the Project Method , 2012 .

[27]  John L. Pecore,et al.  From Kilpatrick’s project method to project-based learning , 2015 .

[28]  S. Billett Conceptualizing Learning Experiences: Contributions and Mediations of the Social, Personal, and Brute , 2009 .

[29]  Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard,et al.  WHY STUDENTS CHOOSE (NOT) TO STUDY ENGINEERING , 2010 .

[30]  L. Markauskaite,et al.  Examining the role of authenticity in supporting the development of professional identity: an example from teacher education , 2012 .

[31]  L. Helle,et al.  Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots , 2006 .

[32]  A. MacLeod,et al.  Caring, competence and professional identities in medical education , 2011, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[33]  Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard,et al.  What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? , 2010 .

[34]  Steven L. Goldman,et al.  Why we need a philosophy of engineering: a work in progress , 2004 .

[35]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[36]  J. S. Oliver,et al.  Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals , 2008 .

[37]  Abdullah Almasri,et al.  Career patterns for IT engineering graduates , 2013 .

[38]  W. Faulkner `Nuts and Bolts and People' , 2007 .

[39]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold capabilities: threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory , 2013 .

[40]  Member spotlight part 2: Mats Daniels , 2017, SGCS.

[41]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Intercultural competence in global collaboration courses in computer engineering. , 2012 .

[42]  Stephanie Bell Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future , 2010 .

[43]  Maher Z. Hashweh Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge , 2005 .

[44]  Reed Stevens,et al.  Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning , 2008 .

[45]  L. Shulman,et al.  How and What Teachers Learn: A Shifting Perspective , 2004 .

[46]  John Heywood,et al.  Philosophy and undergraduate teaching and learning: Thoughts and perspectives for engineering education , 2012 .

[47]  Maher Z. Hashweh Chapter 6 Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Twenty-Five Years Later , 2013 .

[48]  Anders Berglund,et al.  Experiences of teachers in computing as role models: a phenomenographic study , 2017, Koli Calling.

[49]  Robert McCartney,et al.  School/Work: Development of Computing Students' Professional Identity at University , 2015, ICER.

[50]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .