Location Based Services for Human Self-Localization

Human self-localisation is an important part of everyday life. In order to determine one’s own position and orientation, the allocentric representation, usually in the form of a map, has to be aligned with one’s own egocentric representation of the real world. This requires objects (anchor points) that are present in both representations. We present two novel approaches that aim to simplify the process of alignment and thus the self-localisation. The Viewshed approach is based on visibility analysis and the Image Recognition approach identifies objects and highlights them on the map. On the basis of an empirical experiment with 30 participants in the city of Vienna, Austria, the two approaches were compared with each other as well as with a standard approach using a 2D map representation. The goal is to assess and compare aspects like efficiency, user experience, and cognitive workload. Results show that the Image Recognition method provided the best support and was also most popular among users. The Viewshed method performed well below expectations.

[1]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. , 2002 .

[2]  Martin Raubal,et al.  Wayfinding Decision Situations: A Conceptual Model and Evaluation , 2014, GIScience.

[3]  Clare Davies,et al.  Effects of Geometry, Landmarks and Orientation Strategies in the 'Drop-Off' Orientation Task , 2007, COSIT.

[4]  Clare Davies,et al.  Spaces or Scenes: Map-based Orientation in Urban Environments , 2010, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[5]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Controllability matters: The user experience of adaptive maps , 2017, GeoInformatica.

[6]  Martin Raubal,et al.  GeoGazemarks: providing gaze history for the orientation on small display maps , 2012, ICMI '12.

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Orientation Tasks with Multiple Views of Space: Strategies and Performance , 2004, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[8]  Clare Davies,et al.  Isovists for orientation: can space syntax help us predict directional confusion? , 2006 .

[9]  R. Logie,et al.  The Role of Perspective in Locating Position in a Real-World, Unfamiliar Environment , 2003 .

[10]  Stephan Winter,et al.  You‐are‐here maps in emergencies –the danger of getting lost , 2006 .

[11]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  R. Golledge.  Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes , 2010 .

[13]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks , 2002, GIScience.

[14]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[15]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[16]  David Waller,et al.  Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  How Much Information Do You Need? Schematic Maps in Wayfinding and Self Localisation , 2006, Spatial Cognition.

[18]  Martin Raubal,et al.  Where Am I? Investigating Map Matching During Self‐Localization With Mobile Eye Tracking in an Urban Environment , 2014, Trans. GIS.

[19]  Glenn Gunzelmann,et al.  Location matters: Why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  Gaze-Informed location-based services , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..