Initiation of deformation of the Eastern California Shear Zone: Constraints from Garlock fault geometry and GPS observations

[1] We suggest a 2-stage deformation model for the Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ) to explain the geometry of the Garlock fault trace. We assume the Garlock fault was originally straight and then was gradually curved by right-lateral shear deformation across the ECSZ. In our 2-stage deformation model, the first stage involves uniform shear deformation across the eastern part of the shear zone, and the second stage involves uniform shear deformation across the entire shear zone. In addition to the current shape of the Garlock fault, our model incorporates constraints on contemporary deformation rates provided by GPS observations. We find that the best fitting age for initiation of shear in eastern part of the ECSZ is about 5.0 ± 0.4 Ma, and that deformation of the western part started about 1.6 Myr later.

[1]  K. Sieh,et al.  Long dormancy, low slip rate, and similar slip-per-event for the Emerson fault, eastern California shear zone , 1997 .

[2]  K. Verosub,et al.  Late Cenozoic history and styles of deformation along the southern Death Valley fault zone, California , 1988 .

[3]  M. Reheis,et al.  Late Cenozoic history and slip rates of the Fish Lake Valley, Emigrant Peak, and Deep Springs fault zones, Nevada and California , 1997 .

[4]  J. Walker,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR POST-EARLY MIOCENE INITIATION OF MOVEMENT ON THE GARLOCK FAULT FROM OFFSET OF THE CUDAHY CAMP FORMATION, EAST-CENTRAL CALIFORNIA , 1997 .

[5]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Strain accumulation across the central Nevada seismic zone, 1973–1994 , 1995 .

[6]  Douglas W. Burbank,et al.  Temporally constrained tectonic rotations derived from magnetostratigiraphic data: Implications for the initiation of the Garlock fault, California , 1987 .

[7]  W. Harbert,et al.  Late Neogene motion of the Pacific plate , 1989 .

[8]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Strain accumulation across the Eastern California Shear Zone at latitude 36°30′N , 2000 .

[9]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  Refined kinematics of the Eastern California shear zone from GPS observations, 1993-1998 , 2001 .

[10]  R. Donelick,et al.  Late Cenozoic extensional transfer in the Walker Lane strike-slip belt, Nevada , 1994 .

[11]  A. Aydin,et al.  Is the San Andreas big bend responsible for the Landers earthquake and the eastern California shear zone , 1996 .

[12]  John H. Stewart,et al.  Extensional tectonics in the Death Valley area, California: Transport of the Panamint Range structural block 80 km northwestward , 1983 .

[13]  Roy K. Dokka,et al.  Role of the Eastern California Shear Zone in accommodating Pacific‐North American Plate motion , 1990 .

[14]  Robert W. King,et al.  Present day kinematics of the Eastern California Shear Zone from a geodetically constrained block model , 2001 .

[15]  B. Burchfiel,et al.  Geology of Panamint Valley ‐ Saline Valley Pull‐Apart System, California: Palinspastic evidence for low‐angle geometry of a Neogene Range‐Bounding Fault , 1987 .