Measuring Maximizing Judges: Empirical Legal Studies, Public Choice Theory, and Judicial Behavior
暂无分享,去创建一个
In this brief Article, I explore the growing empirical evidence in support of the public choice model of judicial decision making. Although legal scholars have traditionally been reluctant to engage in a critical inquiry into the role of judicial self-interest on judicial behavior, recent empirical studies confirm many of the predictions of the model. As a result, the public choice model has gained broad acceptance across a range of disciplines, courts, and even the U.S. public.
[1] Richard A. Posner,et al. Social Norms and the Law: An Economic Approach , 1997 .
[2] Michael S. Kang,et al. The Partisan Price of Justice: An Empirical Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions , 2010 .
[3] Stephen B. Burbank. On the Study of Judicial Behaviors: Of Law, Politics, Science and Humility , 2009 .
[4] T. Clark,et al. Judicial Independence and Nonpartisan Elections , 2008 .