Improving a Web-Based Tool to Support Older Adults to Stay Independent at Home: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Older adults desire to stay independent at home for as long as possible. We developed an interactive website to inform older adults and caregivers about ways to achieve this. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to perform an in-depth exploration among potential end users about how to improve the interactive website to better inform older adults and caregivers about ways to stay independent at home. METHODS To complement the results of a quantitative survey on the usability and acceptability of the website before implementation, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Using multiple recruitment strategies, we recruited a purposeful sample of older adults (aged ≥65 years) and caregivers of older adults struggling to stay independent at home. We conducted face-to-face or telephonic interviews in either English or French. In addition, we collected sociodemographic characteristics, other characteristics of participants (eg, health, digital profile, and perception of retirement homes), and experiences with using the website (factors facilitating the use of the website, barriers to its use, and suggestions for improvement). Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed by two researchers. RESULTS We recruited 15 participants, including 5 older adults (mean age 75 years, SD 6) and 10 caregivers (mean age 57 years, SD 14). The mean interview time was 32 min (SD 14). Most older adults had either mobility or health problems or both, and many of them were receiving home care services (eg, blood pressure measurement and body care). Overall, participants found the website easy to navigate using a computer, reassuring, and useful for obtaining information. Barriers were related to navigation (eg, difficult to navigate with a cellphone), relevance (eg, no specific section for caregivers), realism (eg, some resources presented are not state funded), understandability (eg, the actors’ accents were difficult to understand), and accessibility (eg, not adapted for low digital literacy). Suggestions for improvement included a needs assessment section to direct users to the support appropriate to their needs, addition of information about moving into residential care, a section for caregivers, distinction between state-provided and private support services, simpler language, expansion of content to be relevant to all of Canada, and video subtitles for the hearing impaired. CONCLUSIONS Users provided a wealth of information about the needs of older adults who were facing a loss of autonomy and about what such a website could usefully provide. The request for less generic and more personalized information reflects the wide range of needs that electronic health innovations, such as our interactive website, need to address. After integrating the changes suggested, the new website—Support for Older Adults to Stay Independent at Home (SUSTAIN)—will be implemented and made available to better assist older adults and caregivers in staying independent at home.

[1]  Sabrina T. Wong,et al.  Assessment of scalability of evidence-based innovations in community-based primary health care: a cross-sectional study. , 2018, CMAJ open.

[2]  F. Légaré,et al.  “Please listen to me”: A cross-sectional study of experiences of seniors and their caregivers making housing decisions , 2018, PloS one.

[3]  F. Légaré,et al.  Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  F. Légaré,et al.  Deciding How to Stay Independent at Home in Later Years: Development and Acceptability Testing of an Informative Web-Based Module , 2017, JMIR human factors.

[5]  W. Hsu,et al.  Balancing competing needs mediates the association of caregiving demand with caregiver role strain and depressive symptoms of dementia caregivers: A cross‐sectional study , 2017, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  C. Kuziemsky,et al.  Collaborative writing applications in healthcare: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  France Légaré,et al.  Impact of home care versus alternative locations of care on elder health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews , 2017, BMC Geriatrics.

[8]  K. Malterud,et al.  Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[9]  M. Taljaard,et al.  Implementing shared decision-making in interprofessional home care teams (the IPSDM-SW study): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial , 2016, BMJ Open.

[10]  F. Légaré,et al.  Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design , 2016, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[11]  F. Légaré,et al.  A Synthesis Of Knowledge About Caregiver Decision Making Finds Gaps In Support For Those Who Care For Aging Loved Ones. , 2016, Health affairs.

[12]  G. Livingston,et al.  How people with dementia and their families decide about moving to a care home and support their needs: development of a decision aid, a qualitative study , 2016, BMC Geriatrics.

[13]  L. Rivest,et al.  Improving Decision making On Location of Care with the frail Elderly and their caregivers (the DOLCE study): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial , 2015, Trials.

[14]  J. Gutmann,et al.  Qualitative research practice: : a guide for social science students and researchers (2nd edn). , 2014 .

[15]  Heejung Kim,et al.  Home modification by older adults and their informal caregivers. , 2014, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[16]  F. Légaré,et al.  An interprofessional approach to shared decision making: an exploratory case study with family caregivers of one IP home care team , 2014, BMC Geriatrics.

[17]  G. Ottmann,et al.  A systematic narrative review of consumer-directed care for older people: implications for model development. , 2013, Health & social care in the community.

[18]  K. Covinsky,et al.  Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[20]  Carole Després,et al.  When mobility makes sense: A qualitative and longitudinal study of the daily mobility of the elderly , 2011 .

[21]  M. Viitanen,et al.  Perceptions of the psychological well-being and care of older home care clients: clients and their carers. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[22]  Suzanne Garon,et al.  Le programme Villes amies des aînés de l’Organisation mondiale de la santé : une occasion de reconnaissance pour les aînés , 2008 .

[23]  Rachael Gooberman-Hill,et al.  Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, The Lancet.

[24]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[25]  Robert L Kane,et al.  Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S: a meta-analysis , 2007, BMC geriatrics.

[26]  S. Lord,et al.  The Mobility of Elderly Residents Living in Suburban Territories , 2007 .

[27]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[28]  D. Kendrick,et al.  Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  A. Stuck,et al.  Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[30]  Elmar Brähler,et al.  Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. , 2010, Age and ageing.

[31]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .