Inter-individual Differences in the Effects of Aircraft Noise on Sleep Fragmentation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES Environmental noise exposure disturbs sleep and impairs recuperation, and may contribute to the increased risk for (cardiovascular) disease. Noise policy and regulation are usually based on average responses despite potentially large inter-individual differences in the effects of traffic noise on sleep. In this analysis, we investigated what percentage of the total variance in noise-induced awakening reactions can be explained by stable inter-individual differences. METHODS We investigated 69 healthy subjects polysomnographically (mean ± standard deviation 40 ± 13 years, range 18-68 years, 32 male) in this randomized, balanced, double-blind, repeated measures laboratory study. This study included one adaptation night, 9 nights with exposure to 40, 80, or 120 road, rail, and/or air traffic noise events (including one noise-free control night), and one recovery night. RESULTS Mixed-effects models of variance controlling for reaction probability in noise-free control nights, age, sex, number of noise events, and study night showed that 40.5% of the total variance in awakening probability and 52.0% of the total variance in EEG arousal probability were explained by inter-individual differences. If the data set was restricted to nights (4 exposure nights with 80 noise events per night), 46.7% of the total variance in awakening probability and 57.9% of the total variance in EEG arousal probability were explained by inter-individual differences. The results thus demonstrate that, even in this relatively homogeneous, healthy, adult study population, a considerable amount of the variance observed in noise-induced sleep disturbance can be explained by inter-individual differences that cannot be explained by age, gender, or specific study design aspects. CONCLUSIONS It will be important to identify those at higher risk for noise induced sleep disturbance. Furthermore, the custom to base noise policy and legislation on average responses should be re-assessed based on these findings.

[1]  Jürgen Wenzel,et al.  Effects of Nocturnal Aircraft Noise - Volume 1: Executive Summery , 2004 .

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  T. Dang-Vu,et al.  Spontaneous brain rhythms predict sleep stability in the face of noise , 2010, Current Biology.

[4]  Mathias Basner,et al.  Nocturnal aircraft noise exposure increases objectively assessed daytime sleepiness , 2008 .

[5]  Mathias Basner,et al.  Single and combined effects of air, road and rail traffic noise on sleep , 2006 .

[6]  Erik Olofsen,et al.  Mixed-model regression analysis and dealing with interindividual differences. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  A. M. Taylor,et al.  Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep. , 1960, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  A. Muzet Environmental noise, sleep and health. , 2007, Sleep medicine reviews.

[9]  E. Wolpert A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. , 1969 .

[10]  S. Janssen,et al.  Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health , 2014, The Lancet.

[11]  C. Guilleminault,et al.  EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples: a preliminary report from the Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association. , 1992, Sleep.

[12]  Mathias Basner,et al.  EXPOSURE AND SLEEP Single and Combined Effects of Air , Road , and Rail Traffic Noise on Sleep and Recuperation , 2010 .

[13]  Mathias Basner Validity of aircraft noise induced awakening predictions , 2009 .