Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Kemper,et al. Life-span changes to adults' language: Effects of memory and genre , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[2] Brent Edwards,et al. The Future of Hearing Aid Technology , 2007, Trends in amplification.
[3] S Gatehouse,et al. Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[4] A. Zekveld,et al. Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[5] E. Granholm,et al. Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.
[6] A. Zekveld,et al. Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[7] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] J. Beatty. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.
[9] A. Stewart,et al. Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’ , 2014, International journal of audiology.
[10] G K Poock,et al. Information processing vs pupil diameter. , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.
[11] Karolina Smeds,et al. Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[12] T. Lunner,et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[13] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[14] G. Gendolla,et al. Effort Mobilization when the Self is Involved: Some Lessons from the Cardiovascular System , 2010 .
[15] G. Buck. Assessing Listening , 2001 .
[16] Birger Kollmeier,et al. An Eye-Tracking Paradigm for Analyzing the Processing Time of Sentences with Different Linguistic Complexities , 2014, PloS one.
[17] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[18] Birger Kollmeier,et al. The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing-impaired listeners , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[19] L. N. Johnson. Pupil response. , 1989, The Western journal of medicine.
[20] I. Johnsrude,et al. Factors that increase processing demands when listening to speech , 2015 .
[21] Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. , 2013, Psychophysiology.
[22] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[23] B. Hornsby. The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated With Sustained Speech Processing Demands , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[24] J. Towse,et al. Individual differences in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.
[25] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[26] M. McAuliffe,et al. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[27] Gurjit Singh,et al. Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006, Trends in amplification.
[28] A. Zekveld,et al. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.
[29] A. Zekveld,et al. Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[30] D. Kahneman,et al. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[31] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[32] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[33] Greg J Siegle,et al. Use of concurrent pupil dilation assessment to inform interpretation and analysis of fMRI data , 2003, NeuroImage.
[34] D Kahneman,et al. Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.
[35] P. Carpenter,et al. Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .
[36] R. Ornstein,et al. Pupillary Responses During Information Processing Vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores , 2022 .
[37] Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise , 2011, International journal of audiology.
[38] P. Rabbitt,et al. Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[39] E. Granholm,et al. Pupillary responses on the visual backward masking task reflect general cognitive ability. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[40] S. Arlinger,et al. Speech understanding in quiet and noise, with and without hearing aids , 2005, International journal of audiology.
[41] R. Hetherington. The Shellen chart as a test of visual acuity , 1954, Psychologische Forschung.
[42] Mads Poulsen,et al. Context Improves Comprehension of Fronted Objects , 2014, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[43] F H Bess,et al. A comparison of the aided performance and benefit provided by a linear and a two-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aid. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[44] J M Festen,et al. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[45] Hintat Cheung,et al. Competing complexity metrics and adults' production of complex sentences , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[46] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] B Hagerman,et al. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.
[48] T. Kobayashi,et al. Hearing Impairment , 2004, Springer Japan.
[49] S Arlinger,et al. Verbal information-processing capabilities and cochlear implants: implications for preoperative predictors of speech understanding. , 1996, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.
[50] Isabell Wartenburger,et al. Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: insights from pupillometry. , 2010, Psychophysiology.
[51] Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[52] Thomas Lunner,et al. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance , 2016, International journal of audiology.
[53] Prithima R Mosaly,et al. Quantifying the impact of cross coverage on physician's workload and performance in radiation oncology. , 2013, Practical radiation oncology.
[54] Birger Kollmeier,et al. How Hearing Impairment Affects Sentence Comprehension: Using Eye Fixations to Investigate the Duration of Speech Processing , 2015, Trends in hearing.
[55] J. Rönnberg. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[56] Thomas Lunner,et al. Assessing listening effort by measuring short-term memory storage and processing of speech in noise , 2014 .
[57] J. Brehm,et al. The intensity of motivation. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.
[58] A. Wingfield,et al. Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. , 2010, Psychophysiology.
[59] T. Lunner,et al. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[60] J. Beatty,et al. Pupillary responses during information processing vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. , 1979, Science.
[61] A. Wingfield,et al. Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood , 2005 .
[62] Line Burholt Kristensen,et al. Semantic role assignment in Danish children and adults , 2014 .
[63] R. Plomp. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.