Near-bottom performance of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) – a comparative study

In a laboratory flume, a comparative study on the near-bottom performance of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) was conducted. Two different ADV systems were tested for different configurations and two flow velocities (9 cm s−1, 18 cm s−1). The results were compared with synchronous measurements with a Laser Doppler Anemometer (LDA). Near-bottom velocity measurements with the ADV have to be interpreted carefully as the ADV technique underestimates flow velocities in a zone close to the sediment. The height of this zone above the sediment varies with different ADV systems and configurations. The values for nominal sampling volume height (SVH) given by the software often underestimate the true, effective sampling volume heights. Smaller nominal SVH improve the ADV near-bottom performance, but the vertical extent of the zone in which the ADV underestimates flow by more than 20% may be larger than true SVH/2 by a factor of 2 (=true SVH). When the measurement volume approaches the bottom, ADV data quality parameters (signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and signal amplitude) exceeding the average ‘open water’ level, are clear indicators that the ADV has begun to underestimate the flow velocity. Unfortunately, this is not a safe indicator for the range of reliable measurements as the ADV may begin to underestimate velocities even with unchanged ‘open water’ data quality parameters. Thus, one can only recommend avoiding measurements below a distance from the bottom that was defined empirically comparing the ADV and the LDA velocity profiles. This distance is 2.5 times nominal sampling volume height for the tested ADV systems and experimental settings.

[1]  Fernando Jara,et al.  Observations of intratidal variability of flows over a sill/contraction combination in a Chilean fjord , 2001 .

[2]  E. Koch.  Preliminary evidence on the interdependent effect of currents and porewater geochemistry on Thalassia testudinum Banks ex König seedlings , 1999 .

[3]  S.-C. Kim,et al.  Estimating bottom stress in tidal boundary layer from acoustic doppler velocimeter data , 2000 .

[4]  Ramon Cabrera,et al.  New Acoustic Meter for Measuring 3D Laboratory Flows , 1994 .

[5]  D. Hart,et al.  Fine‐scale field measurement of benthic flow environments inhabited by stream invertebrates , 1996 .

[6]  J. F. A. Sleath,et al.  Sea bed mechanics , 1984 .

[7]  S. Thrush,et al.  Seabed drag coefficient over natural beds of horse mussels (Atrina zelandica) , 1998 .

[8]  G. Graf,et al.  Skimming flow induced over a simulated polychaete tube lawn at low population densities , 2000 .

[9]  B. Biggs,et al.  The effects of the moss Fissidens rigidulus (Fissidentaceae: Musci) on near‐bed flow structure in an experimental cobble bed flume , 1998 .

[10]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Nearshore Biomechanics. (Book Reviews: Biology and the Mechanics of the Wave-Swept Environment) , 1988 .

[11]  André Robert,et al.  Scales of boundary resistance in coarse-grained channels : turbulent velocity profiles and implications , 2001 .

[12]  D. Aubrey,et al.  Velocity observations above a rippled bed using laser Doppler velocimetry , 1992 .

[13]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of the Thin Near-bed Layer in a Complex Marine Environment: A Case Study in Beatrix Bay, New Zealand , 2002 .

[14]  D. Kristmanson,et al.  Benthic suspension feeders and flow , 1997 .

[15]  M. Huettel,et al.  Flow‐induced uptake of particulate matter in permeable sediments , 1996 .

[16]  Jenny Davis,et al.  Manipulating the intensity of near‐bed turbulence in rivers: effects on benthic invertebrates , 1999 .

[17]  P. Blondeaux.  MECHANICS OF COASTAL FORMS , 2003 .

[18]  R. Cabrera,et al.  Direct measurements of Reynolds stress with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter , 1995, Proceedings of the IEEE Fifth Working Conference on Current Measurement.

[19]  J. Katz,et al.  Turbulence Characteristics and Dissipation Estimates in the Coastal Ocean Bottom Boundary Layer from PIV Data , 2001 .

[20]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  Structure of the internal boundary layer over a patch of pinnid bivalves (Atrina zelandica) in an estuary. , 2002 .

[21]  J. Doering,et al.  An investigation of the velocity field under regular and irregular waves over a sand beach , 2002 .

[22]  D. Hart,et al.  Evaluating the spatial resolution of an acoustic Doppler velocimeter and the consequences for measuring near‐bed flows , 1999 .

[23]  Vito Ferro,et al.  Flow Velocity Measurements in Vegetated Channels , 2002 .

[24]  M. Huettel,et al.  Impact of biogenic sediment topography on oxygen fluxes in permeable seabeds , 1996 .

[25]  G. Graf,et al.  A high-precision current measurement system for laboratory flume systems: a case study around a circular cylinder , 1999 .

[26]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Flow Measurement from an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle with Applications to Deep Ocean Convection , 2001 .