Algorithm combination strategy to obtain the second‐order advantage: simultaneous determination of target analytes in plasma using three‐dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy

Although a number of algorithms have established to obtain the well‐known second‐order advantage that quantifies analytes of interest in the presence of interferents, each has associated problems. In this work, for the first time, the optimization procedure of trilinear decomposition has been divided into three subparts, and a novel strategy is developed for assembling the advantages of the alternating trilinear decomposition (ATLD) algorithm, the self‐weighted alternating trilinear decomposition (SWATLD) algorithm, and the parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) algorithm. The performance of the proposed strategy was evaluated using a simulated data set, a published fluorescence data set together with a new fluorescence data set that simultaneously quantifies procaine and tetracaine in plasma. Results show that the novel method can accurately and effectively estimate the qualitative and quantitative information of analytes of interest. Besides, the resolved profiles are very stable with respect to the number of components as long as the employed number is chosen to be equal or larger than the underlying one. Additionally, the study confirms that better prediction can be obtained by the new strategy when compared with ATLD, SWATLD, and PARAFAC as well as the strategy that employs direct trilinear decomposition method as initial values for PARAFAC. Moreover, the strategy can be directly extended to third‐order or higher‐order data analysis. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mathias Nilsson,et al.  T1-diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: nuclear magnetic resonance mixture analysis using parallel factor analysis. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  Rolf Sundberg,et al.  Second-order calibration: bilinear least squares regression and a simple alternative , 1998 .

[3]  Ronei J. Poppi,et al.  Second- and third-order multivariate calibration: data, algorithms and applications , 2007 .

[4]  N. M. Faber,et al.  Second-order bilinear calibration : the effects of vectorising the data matrices of the calibration set , 2002 .

[5]  R. Bro,et al.  A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models , 2003 .

[6]  Jerry Workman,et al.  Process analytical chemistry. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  A novel efficient way to estimate the chemical rank of high-way data arrays. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[8]  Héctor C. Goicoechea,et al.  The application to wastewaters of chemometric approaches to handling problems of highly complex matrices , 2007 .

[9]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Selectivity, local rank, three‐way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution , 1995 .

[10]  Alejandro C Olivieri,et al.  Analytical advantages of multivariate data processing. One, two, three, infinity? , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  An alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm with application to calibration of HPLC–DAD for simultaneous determination of overlapped chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons , 1998 .

[12]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Recent developments in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC x GC) II. Modulation and detection , 2006 .

[13]  R. Yu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of fluphenazine hydrochloride in human urine using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence based on oxidation derivatization and combined with second-order calibration methods , 2010 .

[14]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  On the self‐weighted alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm—the property of being insensitive to excess factors used in calculation , 2001 .

[15]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Tensorial resolution: A direct trilinear decomposition , 1990 .

[16]  Ru-Qin Yu,et al.  Efficient way to estimate the optimum number of factors for trilinear decomposition , 2001 .

[17]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  A comparison of several trilinear second-order calibration algorithms , 2011 .

[18]  A. Olivieri On a versatile second‐order multivariate calibration method based on partial least‐squares and residual bilinearization: Second‐order advantage and precision properties , 2005 .

[19]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) from 2000: Progress in Concepts and Applications , 2006 .

[20]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Mathematical chromatography solves the cocktail party effect in mixtures using 2D spectra and PARAFAC , 2010 .

[21]  Bruce R. Kowalski,et al.  An improved algorithm for the generalized rank annihilation method , 1989 .

[22]  R. Bro PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .

[23]  G. M. Mong,et al.  Impurity profiling of a chemical weapon precursor for possible forensic signatures by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and chemometrics. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  L. McGown,et al.  Molecular fluorescence, phosphorescence, and chemiluminescence spectrometry. , 1988, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Analysis of environmental samples by application of multivariate curve resolution on fused high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection mass spectrometry data. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  Bruce R. Kowalski,et al.  Generalized rank annihilation factor analysis , 1986 .

[27]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Multicomponent Determination of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Using a Reaction-Based Chemical Sensor. 3. Medium-Rank Second-Order Calibration with Restricted Tucker Models , 1994 .

[28]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  Multi-way chemometric methodologies and applications: a central summary of our research work. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[29]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Analytical applications of second-order calibration methods. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.

[30]  Yang Li,et al.  A novel trilinear decomposition algorithm for second-order linear calibration , 2000 .