Reading Comprehension and Second Language Development in a Comprehension-Based ESL Program

How do experienced ESL instructors plan and organize their teaching practices to make curriculum innovations? The present research sought answers to this question in three different educational contexts, attempting to document the curriculum concepts, pedagogical knowledge, and processes of instructional planning that eight teachers used to create novel courses for adult ESL learners. Findings describe (1) four modes of planning and twelve cycles of information-gathering in the ESL curriculum planning of one teacher, (2) verification of this framework among four additional teachers, as well as (3) an additional framework for documenting teachers' orientations to curriculum content in second language writing instruction, accounting for three teachers' processes of accommodating an instructional innovation into their usual teaching practices.

[1]  Vĕra Milada Henzl,et al.  Linguistic register of foreign language instruction , 1973 .

[2]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Introspection in second language research , 1989 .

[3]  Evelyn Marcussen Hatch,et al.  Psycholinguistics: A Second Language Perspective , 1983 .

[4]  Susan M. Braidi.  A theoretical framework for the interaction of input and syntactic principles and parameters in the formation of second language grammars , 1990 .

[5]  Gerald G. Neufeld.  On the Acquisition of Prosodic and Articulatory Features in Adult Language Learning. , 1978 .

[6]  S. Krashen.  Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[7]  Sara L. Sanders,et al.  Comprehension Theory and Second Language Pedagogy , 1986 .

[8]  Sharon Lapkin,et al.  Evaluating Bilingual Education: A Canadian Case Study , 1984 .

[9]  Fred Genesee,et al.  Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education , 1987 .

[10]  Valerian A. Postovsky.  Effects of Delay in Oral Practice at the Beginning of Second Language Learning. , 1974 .

[11]  Michael H. Long.  Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Non-Native Speakers , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[12]  G. Kasper,et al.  The Role of Comprehension in Second-language Learning , 1986 .

[13]  S. Burger.  Content-based ESL in a Sheltered Psychology Course: Input, Output, and Outcomes , 1989 .

[14]  C. Chaudron.  Comprehension, Comprehensibility, and Learning in the Second Language Classroom , 1985, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Craig Chaudron,et al.  Second Language Classrooms. Research on Teaching and Learning. , 1988 .

[16]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[17]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications , 1986 .

[18]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Manipulating and Complementing Content Teaching To Maximize Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[19]  Craig Chaudron,et al.  Intake: On Models and Methods for Discovering Learners' Processing of Input , 1985, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[20]  E. Hatch,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF INPUT DATA IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STUDIES , 1975 .

[21]  Michael H. Long,et al.  An introduction to second language acquisition research , 1990 .

[22]  T. D. Terrell.  The Natural Approach to Language Teaching: An Update. , 1985 .

[23]  H. P. Edwards,et al.  Second-Language Acquisition through Subject-Matter Learning: A Study of Sheltered Psychology Classes at the University of Ottawa. , 1984 .

[24]  Michael H. Long.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1981 .