Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

To systematically review randomized trials that assessed the effects of computerized clinical decision support systems in ambulatory diabetes management compared with a non‐computerized clinical decision support system control.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .

[2]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Benjamin Littenberg,et al.  Diabetes decision support: initial experience with the Vermont diabetes information system. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[4]  Beth C Bock,et al.  Clinic-based support to help overweight patients with type 2 diabetes increase physical activity and lose weight. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[6]  Peter J. Hannan,et al.  Improving Diabetes Care in Practice , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[7]  James C. Thomas,et al.  The effect on cost of medical care for patients treated with an automated clinical audit system , 1983, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  W. Hammond,et al.  Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  Amy N. Cohen,et al.  Review paper: Informatics Systems to Promote Improved Care for Chronic Illness: A Literature Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[11]  C. Quinn,et al.  WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  David M Nathan,et al.  A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[13]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial , 2011, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[14]  C. Quinn,et al.  Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Mobile Phone Personalized Behavioral Intervention for Blood Glucose Control , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[15]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: Methods of a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[16]  G. Rutten,et al.  Task delegation and computerized decision support reduce coronary heart disease risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care. , 2007, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[17]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The statistical basis of meta-analysis. , 1993, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Individualized Electronic Decision Support and Reminders Can Improve Diabetes Care in the Community , 2005, AMIA.

[19]  Benjamin Littenberg,et al.  The Vermont Diabetes Information System: A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Population Based Decision Support System , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[20]  G. Rutten,et al.  Combined Task Delegation, Computerized Decision Support, and Feedback Improve Cardiovascular Risk for Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[21]  Patrick M. M. Bossuyt,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2013 .

[22]  G. Rutten,et al.  Original Article: Organisation and Delivery of Care Diabetes Care Protocol: effects on patient-important outcomes. A cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial in primary care , 2010 .

[23]  J. Coleman,et al.  Clinical decision support systems in the care of inpatients with diabetes in non‐critical care setting: systematic review , 2012, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[24]  Karen Davis,et al.  Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction. , 2009, Health policy.

[25]  William M. Tierney,et al.  Postgraduate Medical Education , 2008 .

[26]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[27]  M J Lincoln,et al.  A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[28]  Lars Wallin,et al.  Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[29]  Alessandro Filippi,et al.  Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: an intervention trial. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[30]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[31]  G. Rutten,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of the Diabetes Care Protocol, a Multifaceted Computerized Decision Support Diabetes Management Intervention That Reduces Cardiovascular Risk , 2009, Diabetes Care.