Do Physicians’ Own Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Influence Their Perceptions of Patients’ Preferences?

Patient autonomy, especially the right to choose among alternative effective therapies, is now well established as a guiding principle in medical-treatment decisions. In many critical-care situations, however, patients are no longer capable of participating in the decision-making process. Despite the increasing interest in advance directives, such as living wills or durable powers of attorney for health care, only a small percentage of patients have executed such documents. And even those patients who have signed vaguely worded living wills or designated proxies may still leave surrogate decision makers with no clear information about treatment preferences. Therefore, on many occasions when important life-sustaining treatment decisions have to be made, family members--in conjunction with physicians--are obliged to act without the specific knowledge of what patients would want for themselves. Unfortunately, there is evidence that substitute decision makers, even those who have had a long, intimate familiarity with a patient, may not be accurate predictors of patients’ preferences. 1 Since physicians are powerful agents in the medical decision-making process and are the ones who ultimately control the treatments and procedures, we

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  D. Meier,et al.  Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Uhlmann,et al.  Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  K. Howe,et al.  An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons. , 1990, The Gerontologist.

[7]  C. Cassel,et al.  Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[8]  E. Diamond,et al.  Decision-making ability and advance directive preferences in nursing home patients and proxies. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[9]  E. Emanuel,et al.  The Medical Directive. A new comprehensive advance care document. , 1989, JAMA.

[10]  K. Cain,et al.  Understanding of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences by physicians and nurses. , 1989, The Western journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Ouslander,et al.  Health care decisions among elderly long-term care residents and their potential proxies. , 1989, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  K. Cain,et al.  Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[13]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care. , 1988, JAMA.

[14]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  A comparison of patient, family, and physician assessments of the value of medical intensive care. , 1988, Critical care medicine.

[15]  R. Uhlmann,et al.  Quality of life in chronic diseases: perceptions of elderly patients. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[16]  T. Delbanco,et al.  Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. When do physicians talk with patients? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care. , 1988, JAMA.