Enhanced buried UXO detection via GPR/EMI data fusion

This paper investigates the enhancements to detection of buried unexploded ordinances achieved by combining ground penetrating radar (GPR) data with electromagnetic induction (EMI) data. Novel features from both the GPR and the EMI sensors are concatenated as a long feature vector, on which a non-parametric classifier is then trained. The classifier is a boosting classifier based on tree classifiers, which allows for disparate feature values. The fusion algorithm was applied to a government-provided dataset from an outdoor testing site, and significant performance enhancements were obtained relative to classifiers trained solely on the GPR or EMI data. It is shown that the performance enhancements come from a combination of improvements in detection and in clutter rejection.

[1]  Ning Xiang,et al.  An experimental study on antipersonnel landmine detection using acoustic-to-seismic coupling. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Discrimination mode processing for EMI and GPR sensors for hand-held land mine detection , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  James H. McClellan,et al.  Experimental detection and discrimination of buried targets using an improved broadband CW electromagnetic induction sensor , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[4]  Brian A. Baertlein,et al.  Feature-Level and Decision-Level Fusion of Noncoincidently Sampled Sensors for Land Mine Detection , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[6]  Waymond R. Scott Broadband electromagnetic induction sensor for detecting buried landmines , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[7]  Waymond R. Scott,et al.  Experimental model for a seismic landmine detection system , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Jordan M. Malof,et al.  Fusion of forward looking infrared and ground penetrating radar for improved stopping distances in landmine detection , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[9]  Joel Kositsky,et al.  Results from a forward-looking GPR mine detection system , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Data Mining for Imbalanced Datasets: An Overview , 2005, The Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[11]  Thomas R. Witten Present state of the art in ground-penetrating radars for mine detection , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[12]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  A linear prediction land mine detection algorithm for hand held ground penetrating radar , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Timothy C. Havens,et al.  GPR anomaly detection with robust principal component analysis , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[14]  James M. Keller,et al.  A method of evolving novel feature extraction algorithms for detecting buried objects in FLIR imagery using genetic programming , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[15]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  RUSBoost: A Hybrid Approach to Alleviating Class Imbalance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[16]  Jean-Robert Simard,et al.  Improved landmine detection capability (ILDC): systematic approach to the detection of buried mines using passive IR imaging , 1996, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  Ning Xiang,et al.  An investigation of acoustic-to-seismic coupling to detect buried antitank landmines , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..