Mental Imagery Scale: a new measurement tool to assess structural features of mental representations

Mental imagery is a quasi-perceptual experience which resembles perceptual experience, but occurring without (appropriate) external stimuli. It is a form of mental representation and is often considered centrally involved in visuo-spatial reasoning and inventive and creative thought. Although imagery ability is assumed to be functionally independent of verbal systems, it is still considered to interact with verbal representations, enabling objects to be named and names to evoke images. In literature, most measurement tools for evaluating imagery capacity are self-report instruments focusing on differences in individuals. In the present work, we applied a Mental Imagery Scale (MIS) to mental images derived from verbal descriptions in order to assess the structural features of such mental representations. This is a key theme for those disciplines which need to turn objects and representations into words and vice versa, such as art or architectural didactics. To this aim, an MIS questionnaire was administered to 262 participants. The questionnaire, originally consisting of a 33-item 5-step Likert scale, was reduced to 28 items covering six areas: (1) Image Formation Speed, (2) Permanence/Stability, (3) Dimensions, (4) Level of Detail/Grain, (5) Distance and (6) Depth of Field or Perspective. Factor analysis confirmed our six-factor hypothesis underlying the 28 items.

[1]  Maria Kozhevnikov,et al.  The new object‐spatial‐verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement , 2009 .

[2]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Michael A. Motes,et al.  Object-Spatial Imagery: A New Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire , 2006 .

[4]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[6]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2005 .

[7]  Rolf A. Zwaan The Immersed Experiencer: Toward An Embodied Theory Of Language Comprehension , 2003 .

[8]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[9]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  S. Kosslyn Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[12]  Anne R. Isaac,et al.  An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). , 1986 .

[13]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Factor analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. , 1983 .

[14]  S Pinker,et al.  Directional scanning of remembered visual patterns. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[16]  S. Kosslyn Measuring the visual angle of the mind's eye , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  On the pictorial properties of visual images: effects of image size on memory for words. , 1977, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[19]  R. Gordon An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. , 1949, The British journal of psychology. General section.